Skip to main content
Download PDF

miR-100 inhibits cell proliferation in mantle cell lymphoma by targeting mTOR

Experimental Hematology & Oncology volume 9, Article number: 25 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

miR-100 is reported to be associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis. However, the function of miR-100 in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is unknown. The purpose of this study is to analyze the abnormal expression of miR-100 and mTOR in MCL together with their potential biological function and pathogenesis.

Method

Eighteen MCL tissue samples and 3 cell lines (Jeko-1, Mino, Granta-519) were investigated in this research study, while eighteen samples of proliferative lymphadenitis from patients and peripheral lymphocyte cells from healthy volunteers served as controls. The expression and alteration of miR-100 and mTOR mRNA were detected by RT-PCR. The expression and alteration of mTOR protein were explored by Western blot. LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi were constructed and transfected by lentivirus transfection. Cell proliferation, cell apoptosis and the cell cycle were detected using CCK-8 and flow cytometry. Bioinformatics prediction software was used to predict the miR-100 target gene of mTOR. A double luciferase experiment was used to verify miR-100 targeting at the mTOR-3′-UTR. The interaction between miR-100 and mTOR was further studied using recovery experiments. GraphPad Prism 7 software (version 7.2) was used for statistical analysis, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We found that the expression of miR-100 mRNA in MCL tissues and cell lines was lower, while that of the mTOR protein was higher. There was a negative correlation between miR-100 and mTOR in both MCL tissues and cell lines. Promoting miR-100 and inhibiting mTOR could inhibit cell proliferation, induce cell apoptosis and block the cell cycle in the G1 phase. A double luciferase reporter assay showed that mTOR was one of the target genes of miR-100. The recovery experiment demonstrated that PV-mTOR-up partially set off the effect of LV-miR-100-up on decreasing mTOR expression, inhibiting proliferation, inducing apoptosis and blocking the cell cycle in G1 phase in both Jeko-1 and Mino cells.

Conclusions

Abnormal expression of miR-100 and mTOR was found in MCL, which included downregulation of miR-100 and upregulation of mTOR. The expression of mTOR is negatively correlated with miR-100. It may play an important role in MCL pathogenesis. miR-100 up-regulation can inhibit cell proliferation, promote cell apoptosis, and inhibit cell cycle in G1 phase by targeting the mTOR gene. miR-100 may potentially be an anti-mantle cell lymphoma gene.

Introduction

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an invasive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) derived from B cells, accounting for approximately 7% of the NHL incidence rate [1]. The genetic feature of MCL is the chromosomal translocation t (11;14) (q13; q32), resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1. The efficacy of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is limited. The overall survival of patients with MCL is 4 ~ 5 years [2].

miRNAs are a type of small noncoding RNA with a length of 22 ~ 24 nucleotides that adjust to match the target gene mRNA 3′-end untranslated region (3′-UTR). miRNAs are currently a research hotspot in the process of malignant tumor development, diagnosis, prognosis, drug resistance and treatment. miR-100 is located at 11q24.1 in the human genome, with the gene sequence AACCCGUAGAUCCGAACUUGUG. miR-100 can be a tumor suppressor gene or oncogene, and its expression and function vary in different tumors, and sometimes have opposing roles. It plays a dual role in cancer, according to the changes caused by target genes regulated in related tumors and could even affect tumor biological behavior.

mTOR is a major downstream factor in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, which is highly expressed in many different kinds of tumors [3]. Xie et al. [4] found an important role of the mTOR pathway in the tumorigenesis of MCL. Hess et al. [5] determined that temsirolimus, an inhibitor of mTOR, was beneficial in all MIPI risk categories in patients with MCL. With the discovery of miR-100, an increasing number of related studies have been conducted, some of which have identified target genes and the corresponding signaling pathways of miR-100. Biological information predicted that the mTOR-encoding gene might be one of the target genes of miR-100. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Li et al. [6] found that miR-100 could inhibit cell proliferation and promote cell apoptosis by regulating the target gene FKBP51, affecting glucocorticoid receptor activity, or inhibiting the expression of IGFIR and mTOR. Sun et al. [7] showed that miR-99a/100 promoted apoptosis by targeting mTOR in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Derynck et al. [8] demonstrated that miR-100 might participate in the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by regulating the expression of mTOR and affecting hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Xu et al. [9] also suggested that miR-100 is involved in tumorigenesis and development by regulating the expression of the target gene mTOR. In summary, the abnormal expression of the mTOR pathway promoted the development of MCL, and mTOR was regulated by miR-100 in a variety of different tumors, resulting in the alteration of biological functions, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and metastasis.

However, there is limited understanding of the miR-100 regulatory mechanisms in MCL and the corresponding regulation of the mTOR target gene. In this study, we investigated the expression patterns of miR-100 and mTOR in MCL. Furthermore, the roles of miR-100 and mTOR in proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle progression were studied in MCL cell lines. Direct targets of miR-100 were identified to elucidate the possible regulatory mechanism of miR-100 in MCL.

Materials and methods

Human tissues and cell lines

Eighteen human MCL specimens were obtained from resection tissues at Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between Sep 2016 and Apr 2018. At the same time, 18 patients with hyperplastic lymphadenitis were used as the control. All MCL diagnoses were confirmed by an experienced pathologist on the basis of morphology, immunophenotype findings and molecular genetics. Patients did not undergo any radiotherapy or chemotherapy before resection. The tissue specimens were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and supported by the Research Ethics Committee of Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants before any clinical procedure was initiated.

Normal lymphoid B cells were collected from the blood of healthy volunteers. HEK293T cells and human MCL cell lines (Jeko-1, Mino, Granta-519) were cultured in RPMI‑1640 medium containing 15% FBS and 1% penicillin‑streptomycin. The experiments were conducted in the logarithmic phase and harvested at different time points.

Lentivirus production and transduction

Lentiviral transduction was utilized to overexpress miR-100 in MCL cell lines (Jeko-1, Mino). The lentiviruses contained human miR-100-up-GFP (LV-miR-up), the control (LV-NC-up), LV-mTOR-RNAi-GFP (LV-mTOR-RNAi) and the control (LV-NC-RNAi). The plasmids containing the 3′-UTR of the mTOR luciferase plasmid, miR-100 plasmid, Renilla plasmid, and mTOR-up-GFP plasmid were purchased from Genechem Company (Genechem Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China). The MOI of Jeko-1 was 40, and the MOI of Mino was 60. The lentiviruses were added to 2 × 105/mL cells in 6-well plates with 1 ml of RPMI‑1640 containing no FBS and 40 μl/mL HitransG (Genechem Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China). Fresh culture medium contained 15% FBS after 16 h. Cells were harvested after 72 h of transduction, and qRT‑PCR was performed to confirm the efficiency of transduction.

Bioinformatics prediction and dual‑luciferase reporter assay

The present study used algorithms for target gene prediction. miRanda (https://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do), TargetScan (https://www.targetscan.org/) and PicTar (https://pictar.mdc-berlin.de/) predicted the potential target genes of miR‑100. Next, a dual‑luciferase reporter assay was performed to validate the predicted targets. HEK293T (1 × 105/mL) cells were inoculated in 24‑well plates and cultured in a 37 °C and 5% CO2 incubator. Wild‑type (WT) and mutant (MUT) mTOR were cloned into a renilla plasmid to construct mTOR‑WT and mTOR‑MUT vectors, respectively. Subsequently, 0.1 μg of the 3′-UTR of mTOR luciferase plasmid, 0.4 μg of the miR-100 plasmid, and 0.02 μg of the renilla plasmid were co‑transfected into HEK293T cells using X-tremegene HP transfection reagent. Luciferase activity was measured using the Dual‑Luciferase Reporter System (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) at 48 h after transfection.

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from tissues and cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) with cDNA as the template. RT-PCR was performed using the SYBR green PCR assay (Takara, People's Republic of China). The primers for miR-100, U6, mTOR and GAPDH were purchased from Genechem Company (Genechem Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China). The PCR conditions consisted of 95 °C pre‑denaturation for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 20 s, and extension at 72 °C for 15 s. qRT-PCR was performed on the Bio‑Rad CFX96/CFX Connect™ system (Bio‑Rad Laboratories, Inc, Hercules, CA, USA) to test the relative expression.

Western blot assay

The cell precipitate was washed twice with precooled PBS and lysed by adding 100 μL of lysate and 1 μL of enzyme inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min on ice. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 10 °C for 10 min, the protein was quantified by a BCA protein assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). A total of 50 µg of protein was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and transferred to a membrane. After blocking at room temperature for 1 h, the membrane was incubated with rabbit monoclonal antibodies against mTOR (1:2000, Abcam USA, Cambridge, MA, USA) and mouse monoclonal antibodies against GAPDH (1:2000, Abcam USA, Cambridge, MA, USA) at 4 °C overnight. The membrane was washed with TBS and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibody at 1:2000 (Abcam USA, Cambridge, MA, USA). Finally, the membrane was developed and analyzed using Image analysis software.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell viability was detected using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Sigma-Aldrich, St, Louis, USA) assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, cells were plated in a 96-well plate at 2 × 105/mL per well and infected with miR-100-up or mTOR-RNAi and the corresponding NC lentivirus. Cell proliferation was determined by the CCK-8 assay at the indicated time points. Ten microliters of CCK-8 reagent were added to each well. The absorption (A value) was measured at 450 nm wavelength on the enzyme label to calculate the cell survival rate, using the following equation: (%) = [A (medication) − A (blank)]/[A (control) − A (blank)] × 100. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Cell apoptosis assay

Cells were plated in 6-well plates at 2 × 105/mL per well and infected with miR-100-up or mTOR-RNAi and the corresponding NC lentivirus for 6 days. The cells (2 × 106/mL) were collected in a 5 mL centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was washed with D-Hanks precooled at 4 °C, washed once with 1 × binding buffer, and centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 3 min to collect the cells. The cell pellet was resuspended in 200 µL 1 × binding buffer. Cells were incubated in 5 µL of Annexin V‑FITC and 5 µL of PI in the dark for 10 min. Next, the cells were resuspended in 400 µL of binding buffer. Cell apoptosis was measured using an apoptosis kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Cell cycle assay

The cell cycle was measured using PI (Sigma-Aldrich, St, Louis, USA). Cells were plated in 6-well plates at 2 × 105/mL per well and infected with miR-100-up or mTOR-RNAi and the corresponding NC lentivirus for 6 days. The cells were collected in a 5 mL centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was washed with D-Hanks precooled at 4 °C and centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 5 min. The 75% ethanol was precooled and incubated with the cells for at least 1 h. The samples were centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 5 min to remove the fixative. Then, the cell pellet was washed once with D-Hanks. Preparation of cell staining solution included the following calculations: 40 × PI mother liquor (2 mg/mL): 100 × RNase mother liquor (10 mg/mL): 1 × D-Hanks = 25:10:1000. Analysis was performed using flow cytometry analysis software.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.2. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using an unpaired t test for comparisons of two cohorts. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the remaining data. Linear regression was used for correlation analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The poor expression of miR-100 in MCL tissues and cell lines

To evaluate the state of miR-100 in MCL, the expression of miR-100 in MCL tissues and cell lines was examined by using RT-PCR. miR-100 mRNA was reduced in MCL both in tissues and cell lines compared to hyperplastic lymphadenitis and peripheral lymphocyte cells (p < 0.0001, Fig. 1a, b). This result indicated that miR-100 downregulation might be associated with the formation of MCL. The relationship between clinical features and the level of miR-100 expression was analyzed by the χ2 test, which demonstrated that the lower expression of miR-100 was related to a higher LDH level (≥ 300 U/L) (p = 0.0085) and IPI score > 3 points (p = 0.0156). There was no relationship between patient age, gender, B symptoms, clinical stage, or bone marrow involvement (p > 0.05; Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The abnormal expression of miR‑100 in MCL tissues and cell lines. a RT‑PCR showed that the expression of miR‑100 was reduced in MCL compared to that in hyperplastic lymphadenitis (p < 0.0001). b The RT‑PCR results showed that the expression of miR‑100 was reduced in MCL cells compared to peripheral lymphocyte cells (p < 0.0001)

Full size image
Table 1 Relationship between expression of miR‑100 and clinical characteristics of MCL cases
Full size table

High expression of mTOR in MCL tissues and cell lines

Western blotting detected mTOR protein expression in MCL tissues, and mTOR mRNA in cell lines was checked by RT-PCR. mTOR was overexpressed in the MCL tissues and cell lines compared to the control group (p = 0.003, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2a, b, d). The expression of mTOR protein was negatively correlated with miR-100 mRNA in MCL tissues (r = -0.9196, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2c). The expression of mTOR mRNA was negatively correlated with the expression of miR-100 mRNA in MCL cells (r = −0.9927, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2e).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Evaluate the state of mTOR in MCL tissues and cell lines. a mTOR protein expression in MCL tissues and hyperplastic lymphadenitis. b Western blot analysis of mTOR protein upregulation in MCL compared to that in hyperplastic lymphadenitis (p = 0.003). c The expression of mTOR protein was negatively correlated with that of miR-100 mRNA in MCL tissues (r = −0.9196, p < 0.0001). d RT-PCR analysis showed that mTOR mRNA was higher in MCL cells than in peripheral lymphocyte cells (p < 0.0001). e The expression of mTOR mRNA was negatively correlated with that of miR-100 in MCL cells (r = −0.9927, p < 0.0001)

Full size image

miR-100 inhibited mTOR mRNA and protein

LV-miR-100-up was successfully transfected into Jeko-1 and Mino cells, and miR-100 mRNA levels were remarkably elevated in Jeko-1 and Mino cells (p = 0.0003, Fig. 3a, p = 0.0013, Fig. 3b) as determined by RT-PCR. mTOR mRNA levels were lower in Jeko-1 and Mino cells than in NC cells (p = 0.0005, Fig. 3c, p = 0.0003, Fig. 3d). The mTOR protein of Jeko-1 and Mino cell lines was detected by Western blot after transfection with LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi (Fig. 3e, g). The expression of mTOR protein was decreased after transfection with LV-miR-100-up (p = 0.004, Fig. 3f, p < 0.0001, Fig. 3h) and LV-mTOR-RNAi (p = 0.0001, Fig. 3f, p = 0.0002, Fig. 3h) compared to the corresponding NC in Jeko-1 and Mino cells. mTOR mRNA and protein levels were decreased after LV-miR-100-up transfection.

Fig. 3
figure 3

LV-miR-100 upregulated miR-100 and down regulated mTOR mRNA and protein levels. a RT-PCR showed that the miR-100 mRNA level was increased in the LV-miR-100-up group compared to the NC group in Jeko-1 cells (p = 0.0003). b RT-PCR showed that the miR-100 mRNA level was increased in the LV-miR-100-up group compared to the NC group in Mino cells (p = 0.0013). c RT-PCR showed that the mTOR mRNA level was decreased in the LV-miR-100-up group compared to the NC group in Jeko-1 cells (p = 0.0005). d RT-PCR showed that the mTOR mRNA level was decreased in the LV-miR-100-up group compared to the NC group in Mino cells (p = 0.0003). e Western blot detected the mTOR protein of Jeko-1 cell lines. f The expression of mTOR protein in the LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups was decreased compared to the control group and NC group in Jeko-1 cells. g Western blot detected the mTOR protein of Mino cell lines. h The expression of mTOR protein in the LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups was decreased compared to the control group and NC group in Mino cells

Full size image

Promote miR-100 or reduce mTOR inhibited cell proliferation and arrested the cell cycle in MCL cells

After transfection with LV-miR-100-up or LV-mTOR-RNAi, the cell proliferation of Jeko-1 and Mino cells was detected by CCK-8 assay, and the cell cycle was checked by flow cytometry. In Jeko-1 cells, the OD values in LV-miR-100-up at day 3 (p = 0.0026) and day 5 (p = 0.0002) and in LV-mTOR-RNAi at day 2 (p = 0.0062) and day 5 (p < 0.0001) were lower than those in the control and NC groups (Fig. 4a, b). In Mino cells, the OD value in the LV-miR-100-up group at day 1 (p = 0.0424) and day 5 (p < 0.0001) and that in LV-mTOR-RNAi at day 2 (p = 0.0261) and day 5 (p < 0.0001) were lower than that in the control and NC groups (Fig. 4c, d). Flow cytometry analysis showed that the cell cycle rate was checked in Jeko-1 and Mino cells (Fig. 4e, g). This illustrated that the G1 cell cycle rate in the Jeko-1 LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups was higher than that in the NC group. At the same time, the S cell cycle rate in the Jeko-1 LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups was lower than that in the NC group (p < 0.0001, Fig. 4f, h). The data demonstrated that upregulation of miR-100 or downregulation of mTOR could inhibit cell proliferation and arrest the cell cycle in MCL cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Upregulated miR-100 or downregulated mTOR inhibited cell proliferation and arrested the cell cycle in MCL cells. a CCK-8 assay detected the OD value of cell proliferation in Jeko-1 cells. b Cell proliferation of Jeko-1 cells in the LV-miR-100-up group (day 3 p = 0.0026; day 4 p < 0.0001; day 5 p = 0.0002) and the LV-mTOR-RNAi group (day 2 p = 0.0062; day 3 p = 0.0002; day 4 p = 0.0003; day 5 p < 0.0001) was lower than that in the control and NC groups. c CCK-8 assay detected the OD value of the cell proliferation in Mino cells. d The data demonstrated that the cell proliferation of Mino cells in the LV-miR-100-up group (day 1 p = 0.0424; day 2 p = 0.0447; day 3 p = 0.0005; day 4 p = 0.0001; day 5 p < 0.0001) and the LV-mTOR-RNAi group (day 2 p = 0.0261; day 3 p < 0.0001; day 4 p < 0.0001; day 5 p < 0.0001) was lower than that in the control and NC groups. e Flow cytometry analyzed the cell cycle of Jeko-1 cells. f The data showed that the G1 cell cycle rates of Jeko-1 cells in the LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups were higher than those in the NC group and control group, and the Jeko-1 S cell cycle rate in the LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups was lower than those in the NC group and control group (p < 0.0001). g Flow cytometry analyzed the cell cycle of Mino cells. h The data showed that the G1 cell cycle rates of Mino cells in the LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups were higher than those in the NC group and control group, and the S cell cycle rates in the LV-miR-100-up and LV-mTOR-RNAi groups were lower than those in the NC group and control group (p < 0.0001)

Full size image

miR-100-up or mTOR-RNAi induced apoptosis in MCL cells

Apoptotic cells were detected by flow cytometry after transfection with LV-miR-100-up or LV-mTOR-RNAi in Jeko-1 and Mino cells after 6 days (Fig. 5a, c). The apoptotic rates in the LV-miR-100-up (p < 0.0001, Fig. 5b, d) and LV-mTOR-RNAi (p < 0.0001, Fig. 5b, d) groups were higher than that in the NC group. This result indicated that upregulation of miR‑100 or downregulation of mTOR could induce apoptosis in MCL cells.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Upregulation of miR-100 and downregulation of mTOR induced apoptosis in MCL cells. a Flow cytometry analyzed the apoptosis of Jeko-1 cells. b The data showed that the apoptotic rates of the LV-miR-100-up group (p < 0.0001) and LV-mTOR-RNAi group (p < 0.0001) were higher than those of the NC group and control group in Jeko-1 cells. c Flow cytometry analyzed the apoptosis of Mino cells. d The data showed that the apoptotic rates of the LV-miR-100-up group (p < 0.0001) and LV-mTOR-RNAi group (p < 0.0001) were higher than those of the NC group and control group in Mino cells

Full size image

miR-100 targeted mTOR regulation

To clarify the downstream target of miR-100, we used online Target Scan software, miRanda software, and Pic Tar software to analyze the possible target genes (Fig. 6b). MicroRNA.org online prediction revealed that there was a targeting binding sequence between miR-100 and mTOR (Fig. 6a). Dual luciferase reporter analysis was conducted to detect the binding of miR-100 to the 3′-UTR mTOR mRNA. The WT group was the 3′-UTR wild type, and the MUT group was the 3′-UTR predicted binding site mutation. The study showed that the luciferase activity of the 3′-UTR wild type could be inhibited by miR-100 up (p < 0.05), while the luciferase activity of the 3′-UTR mutant remained unaffected (p > 0.05, Fig. 6c).

Fig. 6
figure 6

miR‑100 targeted the regulation of mTOR expression. a The binding site located between miR-100 and the mTOR-3′ of mTOR mRNA. b Prediction of the miRNA targeting the mTOR gene using bioinformatics software. c The dual‑luciferase assay showed that the mTOR-3′UTR-wt + miR-100 group significantly decreased the relative luciferase activity of HEK293T cells compared to the mTOR-3′ UTR-mut + miR-100 group (p < 0.0001).

Full size image

To investigate the effects of the interaction between miR-100 and mTOR in MCL, PV-mTOR-up and LV-miR-100-up were co-transfected into the Jeko-1 and Mino cell lines, respectively. After 6 days, mTOR mRNA was downregulated in the LV-miR-up + PV-NC-up group compared to the control (p < 0.0001, Fig. 7a, b), and it was upregulated in the LV-miR-up + PV-mTOR-up group (p = 0.0001, Fig. 7a, p < 0.0001, Fig. 7b) compared to the LV-miR-up + PV-NC-up group in Jeko-1 and Mino cells. The expression of mTOR protein is shown in Fig. 7c. The data illustrated that mTOR protein was downregulated in the LV-miR-up + PV-NC-up group compared to the control (p = 0.0041, Fig. 7d, p = 0.0002, Fig. 7e) and was upregulated in the LV-miR-up + PV-mTOR-up group (p = 0.0287, Fig. 7d, p = 0.0027, Fig. 7e) compared to the LV-miR-up + PV-NC-up group. These results showed that the effects of miR-100 on decreasing the expression of mTOR mRNA and protein could be partially affected by the overexpression of mTOR in MCL cells.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Upregulation of mTOR partially canceled the effects of miR-100 on decreasing the expression of mTOR mRNA and protein. a RT-PCR showed that the effects of miR‐100 on decreasing the expression of mTOR mRNA could be partially influenced by overexpression of mTOR in Jeko-1 cells (p < 0.0001). b RT-PCR showed that the effects of miR‐100 on decreasing the expression of mTOR mRNA could be partially influenced by overexpression of mTOR in Mino cells (p < 0.0001). c Western blot analysis of mTOR protein after PV-mTOR-up and LV-miR-100-up were cotransferred into the MCL cell lines. d The expression of mTOR protein in the LV-miR-up+PV-mTOR-up group was increased compared to the LV-miR-up+PV-NC-up group in Jeko-1 cells (p = 0.0287). e The expression of mTOR protein in the LV-miR-up+PV-mTOR-up group was increased compared to the LV-miR-up+PV-NC-up group in Mino cells (p = 0.0027).

Full size image

Upregulation of mTOR partially canceled the effects of miR-100 on inhibiting proliferation, inducing apoptosis and arresting the cell cycle in MCL cells

PV-mTOR-up and LV-miR-100-up were co-transfected into the Jeko-1 and Mino cell lines, respectively. The OD data showed that upregulation of miR-100 and mTOR simultaneously increased cell growth compared with the LV-miR-up + PV-NC-up group in Jeko-1 and Mino cells (Fig. 8a–d).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Upregulation of mTOR partially canceled the effects of miR-100 on inhibiting proliferation in MCL cells. a CCK-8 assay detected the OD value of Jeko-1 cell proliferation after cotransfection with LV-miR-100-up and PV-mTOR-up. b The data demonstrated that the effects of miR‐100 on inhibiting Jeko-1 cell proliferation could be partially influenced by overexpression of mTOR (p < 0.05). c CCK-8 assay detected the OD value of the Mino cell proliferation after cotransfection with LV-miR-100-up and PV-mTOR-up. d The data demonstrated that the effects of miR‐100 on inhibiting Mino cell proliferation could be partially influenced by the overexpression of mTOR (p < 0.05)

Full size image

After cotransfection with PV-mTOR-up and LV-miR-100-up into Jeko-1 and Mino cells for 6 days, cell apoptosis was lower than that of the LV-miR-up + PV-NC-up group (Fig. 9a–d).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Upregulation of mTOR partially canceled the effects of miR-100 on inducing apoptosis in MCL cells. a Flow cytometry analyzed the apoptosis of Jeko-1 cells after cotransfection with LV-miR-100-up and PV-mTOR-up. b The data showed that the effects of miR‐100 on inducing apoptosis could be partially influenced by the overexpression of mTOR in Jeko-1 cells (p < 0.0001). c Flow cytometry analyzed the apoptosis of Mino cells after cotransfection with LV-miR-100-up and PV-mTOR-up. d The data showed that the effects of miR‐100 on inducing apoptosis could be partially influenced by the overexpression of mTOR in Mino cells (p < 0.0001)

Full size image

After cotransfection with LV-miR-100-up and PV-mTOR-up, the G1 cell cycle rate in the Jeko-1 LV-miR-up + PV-mTOR-up group was lower than that in the LV-miR-up + PV-NC-up group, but the S cell cycle rate was higher (Jeko-1: p < 0.0001, Fig. 10a, b; Mino: G1 p = 0.0003, S p = 0.0001, Fig. 10c, d).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Upregulation of mTOR partially canceled the effects of miR-100 on arresting the cell cycle in MCL cells. a Flow cytometry analyzed the cell cycle of Jeko-1 cells after cotransfection with LV-miR-100-up and PV-mTOR-up. b The data showed that the effects of miR‐100 on arresting the cell cycle could be partially influenced by the overexpression of mTOR in Jeko-1 cells (p < 0.05). c Flow cytometry analyzed the cell cycle of Mino cells after cotransfection with LV-miR-100-up and PV-mTOR-up. d The data showed that the effects of miR‐100 on arresting the cell cycle could be partially influenced by the overexpression of mTOR in Mino cells (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma. It is a disease that usually presents at a late stage and is associated with a poor prognosis. While high response rates are observed with induction chemo-immunotherapy, relapse is unfortunately universal in daily clinical practice. Management of the disease with a lack of efficiency is still challenging. Drug resistance is a multifactorial process that is responsible for the absence of chemo-response in primary and secondary types of tumors. Therefore, it is critical to identify novel targets for MCL therapy.

miRNAs are a class of small, endogenous, single-strand noncoding RNAs with a length of 22 ~ 24 nucleotides that exert their function by binding to the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR) of their target mRNAs [10]. miRNAs regulate the expression of > 30% of human target genes by degradation or inhibition of target gene mRNA translation. Each miRNA is predicted to target hundreds of genes, and each target transcript may interact with multiple miRNAs. Accumulating evidence has revealed that altered expression of miRNAs plays an important role in the tumorigenesis of many human cancers [11,12,13]. In the meantime, studies have demonstrated that a single cancer can be driven by different miRNAs, while a single miRNA can be aberrantly expressed in different cancers [14,15,16].

Different kinds of miRNAs have been reported to participate in the physiological processes in MCL by regulating several target genes [17,18,19,20,21,22]. miR-223 influenced MCL cell proliferation and apoptosis by targeting SOX11 directly [23]. It has been confirmed that abnormal expression of miRNAs affects the proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle in MCL cells by targeting multiple intracellular signaling pathways, such as the AKT signaling pathway and NF-kB signaling pathway [24, 25]. miR17-92 clusters play a role in the occurrence and development of MCL, such as activating the PI3K/AKT pathway to mediate nesting [26]. In recurrent mantle cell lymphoma (MCL SP) cells and cell lines, the low expression of miR-16 and the high expression of BMI1 could promote tumorigenesis and development by inhibiting apoptosis [27]. As the first tumor-specific inhibitor of miRNAs, MRX34 has entered phase 1 clinical trials in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and other solid tumors to correct the normal expression of miRNAs or overexpression in tumor cells [28].

miR-100 is a member of the miRNA family. The function of miR-100 is controversial. miR-100 was found to act as a tumor suppressor by deregulating its target genes in hepatocellular carcinoma [29], epithelial ovarian cancer [30], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [31], gastric cancer [32], and breast cancer [33]. However, miR-100 was also found to act as an oncogene in renal cell carcinoma [34] and acute myeloid leukemia [35]. Zhang et al. [36] demonstrated that miR-100 is downregulated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and has different roles in myeloid cell and lymphocyte pathogenesis.

However, no clear information about the function or molecular mechanism of miR-100 in MCL has been reported. In this study, for the first time, we detected the expression of miR-100 in MCL tissues and cell lines, and hyperplastic lymphadenitis and peripheral lymphocyte cells were used as the controls. We demonstrated that the miR-100 level was lower in 18 patients with MCL and in 3 MCL cell lines than the control. Based on the above findings, we further elucidated the molecular mechanism of miR-100 in regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle progression in MCL cell lines by transfecting LV-miR-100-up into Jeko-1 and Mino cells. The overexpression of miR-100 inhibited cell proliferation, induced cell apoptosis and induced G1 arrest in Jeko-1 and Mino cell lines. This suggests that miR-100 might be a tumor suppressor gene in MCL.

At the same time, we detected the expression of mTOR in MCL tissues and cell lines. We demonstrated that the mTOR level was higher in 18 patients with MCL and in 3 MCL cell lines compared to the control. We also found that the expression of mTOR was negatively correlated with miR-100 in MCL tissues and cells. These differences were statistically significant. These results suggest that miR-100 is a tumor suppressor gene and that mTOR might be a candidate oncogene in MCL.

The PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway is the main regulatory pathway of protein translation synthesis, and mTOR is an important part of this signaling pathway [37]. The overexpression of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway could lead to increased transcription of the genes encoding the proliferation control proteins in cells, resulting in a large number of translation and synthesis of cell proliferation-related proteins, thus promoting cell proliferation and inhibition of cell apoptosis. The molecular biology characteristics of MCL are chromosomal translocation and abnormal cytogenetic t (11; 14) (q13; 32), which leads to upregulation of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is a G1 phase cyclin, which drives cells from G1 phase to S phase and promotes cell proliferation, which plays an important role in the occurrence and development in MCL. Gera et al. [38] found that inhibiting mTOR led to downregulation of cyclin D1 transcription and translation and induced G1 arrest. Therefore, we hypothesized that inhibition of the mTOR gene may inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells, induce apoptosis and induce G1 arrest in MCL. Based on the above findings, we transfected LV-mTOR-RNAi into the Jeko-1 and Mino cells. It showed that downregulated mTOR could inhibit cell proliferation, induce cell apoptosis and induce G1 arrest in Jeko-1 and Mino cell lines, which was the same as the upregulation of miR-100 expression. We detected that upregulation miR-100 could increase the expression of mTOR mRNA and protein, which indicated that miR-100 might cooperate with mTOR and play an important role in MCL. These results suggested that MCL cell growth could be influenced by interaction between miR-100 and mTOR.

Combined with these results, we hypothesized that in the development of MCL, the expression of miR-100 decreased, which led to the decrease in mTOR degradation. The increase in mTOR expression promoted MCL cell proliferation, inhibited cell apoptosis, and increased the number of cells in G1 phase into S phase. Therefore, we further verify whether miR-100 could target mTOR gene in MCL, thus affecting the proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle of MCL. Using bioinformatical tools, we found that the 3′-UTR of mTOR has a putative binding site for miR-100. Luciferase assays showed that miR-100 inhibited the luciferase activity of wild-type 3′-UTR of mTOR, but not mutant 3′-UTR of mTOR, which confirmed mTOR was a direct target of miR-100. To confirm the above results, a recovery experiment was conducted in MCL cells. Overexpression of mTOR partially canceled the effects of miR-100 upregulation on inhibiting proliferation, promoting apoptosis and arresting the cell cycle in the Jeko-1 and Mino cells.

Therefore, we can infer that the expression of miR-100 in MCL is decreased, and the degradation of mTOR is reduced, which leads to the excessive activation of mTOR, promotes the proliferation of MCL cells, inhibits apoptosis and promotes the transition from G1 phase to S phase. Upregulation of miR-100 can inhibit cell proliferation, induce apoptosis and arrest the cell cycle in the G1 phase by targeting downregulation of mTOR expression. In conclusion, miR-100 plays an important role in the development of MCL by regulating the expression of mTOR, which may become a new target in the treatment of MCL.

Availability of data and materials

The data-sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fakhri B, Kahl B. Current and emerging treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma. Ther Adv Hematol. 2017;8:223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vose JM. Mantle cell lymphoma: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and clinical management. Am J Hematol. 2017;92:806–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guertin DA, Sabatini DM. Defining the role of mTOR in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:9–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie Y, Li B, Bu W, Gao L, Shi J. Dihydrocelastrol exerts potent antitumor activity in mantle cell lymphoma cells via dual inhibition of mTORC1 and mTORC2. Int J Oncol. 2018;53:823.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hess GCB, Crump M, Gisselbrecht C, Offner F, Romaguera J, et al. Effect of prognostic classification on temsirolimus efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective analysis. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2015;4:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li XJ, Luo XQ, Han BW, Duan FT, Wei PP, Chen YQ. MicroRNA-100/99a deregulated in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, suppress proliferation and promote apoptosis by regulating the FKBP51 and IGF1R/mTOR signalling pathways. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:2189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun J, Chen Z, Tan X, Zhou F, Tan F, Gao Y, et al. MicroRNA-99a/100 promotes apoptosis by targeting mTOR in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2013;30:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Derynck LR. Cell Size and Invasion in TGF-β-Induced Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Is Regulated by Activation of the mTOR Pathway. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:437–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu C, Zeng Q, Xu W, Jiao L, Chen Y, Zhang Z, et al. miRNA-100 inhibits human bladder urothelial carcinogenesis by directly targeting mTOR. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:207–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabriel S, Maria LV, Natalia PM, Arcadi N, Yolanda EP. Differences in molecular evolutionary rates among microRNAs in the human and chimpanzee genomes. BMC Genom. 2016;17:528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen Y, Gong JM, Zhou LL, Sheng JH. MiR-451 as a new tumor marker for gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:56542–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adlakha YK, Saini N, Adlakha YK, Saini N. Brain microRNAs and insights into biological functions and therapeutic potential of brain enriched miRNA-128. Molecular Cancer. 2014;13:33–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Donohoe OH, Henshilwood K, Way K, Hakimjavadi R, Stone DM, Walls D. Identification and Characterization of Cyprinid Herpesvirus-3 (CyHV-3) Encoded MicroRNAs. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Q, Yu J, Wang Q, Yu J, Wang Q, Yu J, et al. MiR-129–5p suppresses gastric cancer cell invasion and proliferation by inhibiting COL1A1. Biochem Cell Biol. 2018;96:19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xie M, Dart DA, Guo T, Xing XF, Cheng XJ, Du H, et al. MicroRNA-1 acts as a tumor suppressor microRNA by inhibiting angiogenesis-related growth factors in human gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:41–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Datta J, Kutay H, Nasser MW, Nuovo G, Wang B, Majumder S, Liu C, et al. Methylation mediated silencing of MicroRNA-1 gene and its role in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li W, Xue W, Wang X, Fu X, Sun Z, Li Z, et al. MiR-199a mediated the dissemination of human mantle cell lymphoma by interacting with the CCR7/CCL21 pair. Anticancer Drugs. 2018;29:861–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Simon H, Ulrik R, Christian G, Roza Z, Sara E, Arne K, et al. miR-18b overexpression identifies mantle cell lymphoma patients with poor outcome and improves the MIPI-B prognosticator. Blood. 2015;125:2669–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rita LhY, Kwan Yeung W, Yok Lam K, Florence L, Chung Ying L, Raymond C, et al. Methylation of miR-155-3p in mantle cell lymphoma and other non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Oncotarget. 2014;5:9770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fumiko A, Yoshizo K, Noriaki Y, Hiroaki M, Atushi D, Kaori Y, et al. Identification of miR-15b as a transformation-related factor in mantle cell lymphoma. Int J Oncol. 2016;48:485–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kopparapu PK, Bhoi S, Mansouri L, Arabanian LS, Plevova K, Pospisilova S, et al. Epigenetic silencing of miR-26A1 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma: impact on EZH2 expression. Epigenetics. 2016;11:335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roisman A, Garaicoa FH, Metrebian F, Narbaitz M, Kohan D, Rivello HG, et al. SOXC And MiR17-92 Gene Expression Profiling Defines Two Subgroups with Different Clinical Outcome in Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2016;55:531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou K, Feng X, Wang Y, Liu Y, Tian L, Zuo W, et al. MiRNA-223 functions as both prognostic biomarker and tumor suppressor in mantle cell lymphoma through targeting SOX11. Exp Hematol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2017.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deng SY, Guo XX, Wang N, Wang KH, Wang S. Network analysis of microRNAs, genes and their regulation in mantle cell lymphoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:457–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alba N, Guillem C, Miriam P, Cristina R, Maria Carmela V, Virginia A, et al. microRNA expression profiles identify subtypes of mantle cell lymphoma with different clinicobiological characteristics. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:3121–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rao E, Jiang C, Ji M, Huang X, Iqbal J, Lenz G, et al. The miRNA-17~92 cluster mediates chemoresistance and enhances tumor growth in mantle cell lymphoma via PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Leukemia. 2012;26:1064.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Teshima K, Nara M, Watanabe A, Ito M, Ikeda S, Hatano Y, et al. Dysregulation of BMI1 and microRNA-16 collaborate to enhance an anti-apoptotic potential in the side population of refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Oncogene. 2014;33:2191–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Aaron B. First microRNA mimic enters clinic. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou HC, Fang JH, Luo X, Zhang L, Yang J, Zhang C, et al. Downregulation of microRNA-100 enhances the ICMT-Rac1 signaling and promotes metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Azizmohammadi S, Azizmohammadi S, Safari A, Kosari N, Kaghazian M, Yahaghi E, et al. The role and expression of miR-100 and miR-203 profile as prognostic markers in epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8:2403.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun X, Liu X, Wang Y, Yang S, Chen Y, Yuan T. miR-100 inhibits the migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by targeting IGF1R. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:8333–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao Y, Song J, Ge J, Song Z, Chen J, Wu C. MicroRNA-100 suppresses human gastric cancer cell proliferation by targeting CXCR7. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:453–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang Q, He M, Guan S, Ma M, Wu H, Yu Z, et al. MicroRNA-100 suppresses the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells by targeting FZD-8 and inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:5001–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gu L, Li H, Chen L, Ma X, Gao Y, Li X, et al. MicroRNAs as prognostic molecular signatures in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:32545–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qin C, Huang RY, Wang ZX. Potential role of miR-100 in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:1403–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang H, Luo XQ, Zhang P, Huang LB, Zheng YS, Wu J, et al. MicroRNA patterns associated with clinical prognostic parameters and CNS relapse prediction in pediatric acute leukemia. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Takahashi K, Murakami M, Yamanaka S. Role of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:1522–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gera JF, Mellinghoff IK, Shi Y, Rettig MB, Tran C, Hsu JH, et al. AKT activity determines sensitivity to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors by regulating cyclin D1 and c-myc expression. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2737–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was funded by Youth Research Fund from Fujian Provincial Health Bureau [Grant Number 2019-1-89] and Startup Fund for scientific research from Fujian Medical University [Grant Number 2017Y1119]. The funding bodies did not participate in study design, in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hematology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China

    Luhui Lin, Yiqun Huang, Wei Zhuang & Xudong Ma

  2. Graduate School, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

    Ping Lin

Authors
  1. Luhui Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yiqun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ping Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xudong Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LL and YH conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. WZ and PL collected data, performed preliminary data analyses, and revised the manuscript. XM coordinated and supervised data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xudong Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Signed informed consent was obtained from all participants before the start of the study.

Consent for publication

All authors are agreed to publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, L., Huang, Y., Zhuang, W. et al. miR-100 inhibits cell proliferation in mantle cell lymphoma by targeting mTOR. Exp Hematol Oncol 9, 25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-020-00182-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-020-00182-2

Keywords

Experimental Hematology & Oncology

ISSN: 2162-3619

Contact us