Open Access

Near complete response after single dose of nivolumab in patient with advanced heavily pre-treated KRAS mutant pulmonary adenocarcinoma

  • Diwakar Davar1,
  • Mark A. Socinski1, 3,
  • Sanja Dacic2 and
  • Timothy F. Burns1, 4Email author
Experimental Hematology & Oncology20154:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-015-0029-7

Received: 16 October 2015

Accepted: 6 December 2015

Published: 14 December 2015

Abstract

The programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor is expressed by activated T-cells and engaged by ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 normally expressed by infiltrating immune cells in response to viral infection. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a negative inhibitory pathway that down-regulates T-cells but is also used by tumors to evade anti-tumor immunity. Antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 axis are capable of restoring functional anti-tumor immunity and have demonstrated efficacy in a broad range of tumor types including non-small cell lung cancer in both squamous and adenocarcinoma histologies. Ongoing issues affecting clinical development of these agents include assessment of response, optimal duration of therapy in excellent responders, predictive biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance. In this report, we describe a patient with advanced KRAS mutant heavily pretreated pulmonary adenocarcinoma who developed an excellent response after a single-dose of nivolumab. Pre-treatment tumor was found to have moderate CD3 and PD-L1 positivity by immunohistochemical staining. Evaluation of exceptional responders and non-responders are critical to furthering our understanding of the mechanisms of action (and resistance) to these agents.

Keywords

Lung cancerAdenocarcinoma KRAS mutantNivolumabProgrammed death receptor-1 (PD-1)

Background

In the past decade, large scale sequencing efforts unraveled the role of molecular driver events in the etiopathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), primarily in adenocarcinoma. Molecular targeted therapies designed to exploit these weaknesses have transformed the management of the minority of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma whose tumors harbor mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or rearrangements in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1). Unfortunately, little progress has been made in the treatment of patients with the most frequently observed driver oncogene, mutant KRAS. KRAS is mutated in one-third of all malignancies and approximately 25 % of all NSCLC [1]. Further, acquired resistance to the currently targetable driver mutations is all but inevitable [2, 3]. Moreover, the prognosis of patients whose tumors do not harbor these genetic changes or those who progress on these agents continue to be treated with chemotherapy and have a median survival of 10–12 months.

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor is an inhibitory T cell receptor expressed by activated T-cells and engaged by ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 of the B7-ligand superfamily normally expressed by infiltrating immune cells in response to viral infection. PD-1/PD-L1 axis constitutes a negative regulatory mechanism by which T-cell activation is homeostatically regulated; but is hijacked by tumors to circumvent effective anti-tumor immunity [46]. PD-1 blockade has been explored as an immunotherapeutic strategy with resounding success in immunogenic tumors (melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma) and additionally in tumors not formerly thought immunogenic including squamous NSCLC. Regulatory approval in squamous NSCLC was granted in early 2015 on the basis of improved survival compared to docetaxel in a 2nd line phase III study though activity has been reported in non-squamous NSCLC as well [7]. In these (and other studies) patients are typically first evaluated for response at 12 weeks. Herein, we report a patient with advanced KRAS mutant pulmonary adenocarcinoma treated with nivolumab after progressing on multiple therapies who had a remarkable response after just a single dose.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old African-American female heavy current smoker presented with dyspnea in September 2012. Initial computer tomography imaging revealed bilateral upper lobe masses with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and bilateral pulmonary and pleural nodules consistent with malignancy. Biopsy revealed CK7/TTF-1 positive adenocarcinoma. Molecular studies were notable for a KRAS exon 2 (pG12C, c.34G>T) mutation and TP53 (pR283P, c.848G>C) but otherwise negative for 48 other key cancer genes as determined by the Ampliseq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 including EGFR/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations, ALK/ROS1/KIF5B/RET rearrangements and MET amplification.

She received 10 fractions of radiation therapy (RT) to mediastinum, then carboplatin and pemetrexed for 4 cycles with a partial response that lasted 5 months before progressing in June 2013. Between June 2013 and January 2015, she received docetaxel, an investigational FAK inhibitor, gemcitabine and pemetrexed. In January 2015, she developed non-infectious pericarditis and spinal metastases requiring RT during which systemic therapy was interrupted till May 2015. Restaging scans documented further pulmonary and mediastinal lymph node progression with no evidence of extra-thoracic metastases. She then received nivolumab 3 mg/kg on May 20, 2015. Two weeks after her first dose, she was subsequently admitted for failure to thrive and dysphagia and was found to have a severe esophageal stricture near the GE junction secondary to extrinsic compression. She was subsequently discharged to a skilled nursing facility with plan for hospice. Two weeks after discharge, a dramatic clinical improvement was observed (weight gain, resolution of dysphagia and improved performance status) and the patient was seen in clinic. Her course was subsequently complicated by exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring admission at which time a restaging CT scan was obtained, then convalescence in a nursing home, which precluded further nivolumab administration despite a remarkable improvement in dysphagia and performance status. Restaging scans showed marked regression in dominant parenchymal lung masses and para-esophagal lymph node commensurate with improving performance status and subjective dysphagia. She has since received 3 further doses of nivolumab with ongoing response on last restaging scans on November 13, 2015.

Discussion

This report highlights the significant depth and duration of responses possible in select patients treated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy (see Fig. 1). Similar dramatic responses have been observed with use of PD-1 inhibitors in other malignancies but this marks the first report of such a dramatic response in a patient with NSCLC with non-squamous histology [8].
Fig. 1

Changes in Bi-dimensional tumor measurements of target and non-target lesions. Computer tomography (CT) scans depict imaging studies done on 5/13/2015 (above) and 7/15/2015 (middle). Lower graph depicts changes in size of target and non-target lesions at both time-points. Tumors were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). Left axis depicts maximal bi-dimensional measurement for 4 (1 target and 3 non-target) lesions while right axis depicts sum of maximal bi-dimensional measurements for all 4 lesions. All measurements are in mm. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered on 5/20/2015 but subsequent doses were missed given multiple admissions. Prior to resumption of therapy following multiple admissions, a restaging scan was repeated on 7/15/2015. Remarkably, all lesions had shrunk considerably with 2 non-target lesions (left pleural nodule and para esophageal lymph node) disappearing completely after a single dose of nivolumab. Patient received 3 doses of nivolumab between 7/8/2015 and 8/12/2015. Therapy is ongoing with continued response

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor is expressed by activated T-cells and engaged by ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. PD-1/PD-L1 axis constitutes a negative regulatory mechanism by which T-cell activation is homeostatically regulated; and is hijacked by tumors to circumvent effective anti-tumor immunity. Currently PD-1 inhibitors are approved for the treatment of BRAF V600 mutated and wild-type melanoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma and NSCLC with ongoing regulatory phase III trials in a host of other diseases including glioblastoma, head and neck carcinoma, small cell lung cancer, microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcoma, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma [9, 10]. In NSCLC, PD-1 blockade is only effective in 20–30 % of NSCLC patients with a 1-year survival rate of 42 % that declines to 18 % at 3 years [11]—much lower than in other malignancies such as melanoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Predictive biomarkers of PD-1 therapy are urgently needed in general but especially in NSCLC where patients often have significant co-morbidities necessitating upfront use of the most efficacious agents. Notably, in this patient, pre-treatment tumor tissue demonstrated PD-L1 and CD3 staining of moderate intensity suggesting a possible explanation for the outstanding response observed (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Histopathological analysis of pre-treatment tumor tissue. Pre-treatment formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimen was stained for CD3, CD8 and PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry. Sections indicate presence of CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells though CD3+ T-cells outnumbered CD8+ T-cells. PD-L1 staining was heterogenous, localized to tumor tissue and of moderate intensity (2+, using method previously described by Taube JM et al., Sci Transl Med 2012)

PD-1/PD-L1 staining is highly contextual and depends on the disease and treatment setting. Evaluation of PD-1/PD-L1 staining in archival samples indicates that staining varies widely in solid tumors being highly expressed in certain tumors (melanoma, sarcoma) but minimally in others (hepatocellular carcinoma) [12]. Within tumors, PD-1/PD-L1 expression appears to be prognostic—being associated with poorer prognoses in multiple tumor types including testicular germ cell tumors and prostate cancer [13, 14]. The observation of PD-L1 upregulation on leukemic cells in patients on treatment with bi-specific antibodies likely represents development of a T-cell-induced immune escape mechanism—and suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition may be complementary to these therapies in this setting [15, 16]. It is likely that the most accurate biomarkers will incorporate elements that reflect the dynamic and complex nature of the immune system including tumor mutation burden and T-cell infiltrate [17, 18]. Close interrogation of the host, tumor and tumor microenvironment in both extraordinary responders and primary non-responders to PD-1 therapy will be critical to this effort.

Consent

Written informed consent for the publication of details, laboratory results and images relating to individual participants was obtained from the participants for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. Copies of the written consents are available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

NSCLC: 

non-small cell lung cancer

EGFR: 

epidermal growth factor receptor

ALK: 

anaplastic lymphoma kinase

ROS1: 

c-ros oncogene 1

PD-1: 

programmed death 1

RT: 

radiation therapy

COPD: 

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

DD, MAS and TFB conceived of this study report, collected the data, wrote and revised the manuscript. TFB was responsible for treatment decisions. SD reviewed initial and subsequent pathology and performed immunohistochemical stains described in attached figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
(2)
Division of Anatomic Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
(3)
Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
(4)
Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute

References

  1. Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W. KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6(2):201–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D, et al. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(75):75ra26.Google Scholar
  3. Katayama R, Shaw AT, Khan TM, et al. Mechanisms of acquired crizotinib resistance in ALK-rearranged lung Cancers. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4(120):120ra17.Google Scholar
  4. Iwai Y, Ishida M, Tanaka Y, Okazaki T, Honjo T, Minato N. Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(19):12293–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. Int Immunol. 2007;19(7):813–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Okazaki T, Chikuma S, Iwai Y, Fagarasan S, Honjo T. A rheostat for immune responses: the unique properties of PD-1 and their advantages for clinical application. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(12):1212–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):123–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Geynisman DM. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody nivolumab leads to a dramatic and rapid response in papillary renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid and rhabdoid features. Eur Urol 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Tsai KK, Daud AI. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in the treatment of advanced melanoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8(1):123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin AY, Lin E. Programmed death 1 blockade, an Achilles heel for MMR-deficient tumors? J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8(1):124.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gettinger SN, Horn L, Gandhi L, et al. Overall survival and long-term safety of nivolumab (Anti-Programmed Death 1 Antibody, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(18):2004–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gatalica Z, Snyder C, Maney T, et al. Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) in common cancers and their correlation with molecular cancer type. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(12):2965–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cierna Z, Mego M, Miskovska V, et al. Prognostic value of programmed-death-1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) in testicular germ cell tumors. Ann Oncol. 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Gevensleben H, Dietrich D, Golletz C, et al. The immune checkpoint regulator PD-L1 is highly expressed in aggressive primary prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015.Google Scholar
  15. Krupka C, Kufer P, Kischel R, et al. Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis augments lysis of AML cells by the CD33/CD3-BiTE® antibody construct AMG 330: reversing a T-cell induced immune escape mechanism. Leukemia. 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Köhnke T, Krupka C, Tischer J, Knösel T, Subklewe M. Increase of PD-L1 expressing B-precursor ALL cells in a patient resistant to the CD19/CD3-bispecific T cell engager antibody blinatumomab. J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8(1):111.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, et al. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015.Google Scholar
  18. Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature. 2014;515(7528):568–71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Davar et al. 2015

Advertisement