Skip to main content
Download PDF

CAR-T cell combination therapies in hematologic malignancies

Experimental Hematology & Oncology volume 13, Article number: 69 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy, a groundbreaking cancer treatment, has achieved remarkable success against hematologic malignancies. However, CAR-T monotherapy faces challenges in certain cases, including treatment tolerance and relapse rates. To overcome these challenges, researchers are investigating combining CAR-T cells with other treatments to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, this review aims to investigate the progress of research in combining CAR-T cells for hematologic malignancies. It covers the basic principles and clinical applications of CAR-T cell therapy, detailing combinations with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted drugs, radiotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and other treatments. These combinations synergistically enhance the antitumor effects of CAR-T cells and comprehensively target tumors through different mechanisms, improving patient response and survival rates.

Introduction

The principle of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is to genetically modify T cells to recognize specific unique targets on tumor surfaces and exert cytotoxic effects [1,2,3]. CAR-T cell therapy has been highly successful in treating various hematologic malignancies and solid tumors [4,5,6,7]. The complete remission rate (CRR) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is 43%, while in follicular lymphoma, it stands at an impressive 71% with sustained remissions [8]. Studies on Idecabtagene vicleucel for multiple myeloma (MM) involving 128 patients showed a 73% objective response rate(ORR), with 33% achieving complete remission (CR) [9]. The CRR for patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) can reach 81% [10]. Manageable adverse effects underscore the remarkable success of CAR-T products in treating hematologic malignancies, offering patients new treatment options and renewed hope. Currently, the FDA has approved six CAR-T cell products for hematologic malignancies [11,12,13,14], all with excellent treatment outcomes. CAR-T has become a reliable approach for treating various hematologic malignancies.

However, comprehensive comparative reports and studies evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of different combination therapies involving CAR-T cells for hematologic malignancies are lacking. Therefore, this review aims to investigate and analyze the progress in research concerning the combination of CAR-T cells with various treatments for hematologic malignancies. This encompasses an exploration of the fundamental principles and clinical applications of CAR-T cell therapy, along with detailed discussions on combinations involving chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted drugs, radiotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and other therapeutic modalities.

CAR-T resistance and relapse

Despite CAR-T therapy demonstrating significant efficacy in some patients, it faces challenges such as tumor relapse and drug resistance in certain individuals [15,16,17]. Relapse rates range from 10 to 30% in B-ALL [18] and can reach 50% in DLBCL [19]. Factors contributing to this include antigen escape, CAR-T cell exhaustion, and an immune-suppressive microenvironment (Fig. 1).

Antigen escape

During CAR-T cell therapy, tumor cells evade CAR-T cell attacks through mechanisms such as acquired mutations [20], selective splicing [21, 22], and lineage switching [23,24,25], resulting in mutated or reduced surface antigen targets. Common surface targets, such as CD19, CD20, CD22, and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), among others, are susceptible to evasion [26,27,28]. Clinical analysis of relapsed samples has revealed genetic mutations in CD19, found in most resistant tumor cells, potentially causing protein truncation and subsequent loss of surface antigen [29]. Several studies indicate that patients with relapsed MM treated with BCMA CAR-T therapy exhibit decreased surface expression of BCMA on tumor cells [30,31,32]. This antigen escape phenomenon can shorten treatment duration and patient survival while complicating therapy. Consequently, novel treatment strategies are needed to address these challenges effectively.

CAR-T cell exhaustion

CAR-T cell exhaustion results in reduced CAR-T cell cytotoxicity, characterized by increased expression of inhibitory receptors, such as programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein-3 (TIM-3), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), on CAR-T cell surfaces [33,34,35,36,37,38]. In treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with CD19 CAR-T cells, while some patients exhibit favorable responses, most do not benefit significantly from CAR-T therapy. Transcriptomic sequencing reveals that T cells in non-responsive patients upregulate programs associated with effector differentiation, glycolysis, exhaustion, and apoptosis [39]. This exhaustion significantly affects CAR-T cell functionality, suggesting that reducing exhaustion could enhance therapeutic efficacy. Research should aim to mitigate exhaustion to improve treatment outcomes.

Immunosuppressive microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment is where CAR-T cells exert their effects. It contains numerous immunosuppressive cells (such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMS), regulatory T cells (Tregs), and myeloid suppressor cells), suppressor cytokines (such as TGF-β and IL-10), and an extracellular matrix [40]. These elements inhibit immune-activated cells through different mechanisms, weakening CAR-T cell function and limiting their infiltration [41, 42]. Studying the influence of the immunosuppressive microenvironment on CAR-T therapy and developing strategies to counter these effects are crucial for enhancing CAR-T treatment efficacy in hematologic malignancies.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mechanisms of CAR-T cell resistance and relapse. (A) Antigen Escape: Tumor cell surface antigens escape, preventing effective recognition and destruction. (B) CAR-T Cell Exhaustion: Increased expression of inhibitory receptors (PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3, CTLA-4) on CAR-T cells leads to exhaustion and reduced anti-tumor function. (C) Immunosuppressive Microenvironment: The tumor microenvironment contains immunosuppressive cells (TAMS, Tregs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells), cytokines (TGF-β, IL-10), and the extracellular matrix. These components inhibit immune cells, weaken CAR-T cell function, and limit infiltration. Tumor cells also consume oxygen and glucose, causing nutrient deprivation and hypoxia, further reducing CAR-T cell activity

Full size image

Researchers are actively exploring new approaches to address these challenges [43]. One such approach involves combining CAR-T cell therapy with other drugs, leveraging the strengths of various treatment modalities. Through this combined approach, the efficacy of CAR-T cells can be preserved and compensate for the limitations of CAR-T monotherapy, extending the survival of the patients. This comprehensive therapeutic strategy offers more holistic and effective treatment options, enhancing hope and opportunities in cancer treatment. Tables 1 and 2 present details on preclinical research and clinical studies.

Table 1 Preclinical research on CAR-T combination therapy
Full size table
Table 2 Clinical research on CAR-T combination therapy
Full size table

Combined therapeutic approaches

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a pivotal tyrosine kinase in the B-cell signaling pathway, regulating B-cell development, maturation, and function. BTK inhibitors are categorized as covalent [62, 63] and noncovalent. Covalent inhibitors, such as ibrutinib [64], zanubrutinib [65, 66], and acalabrutinib, [67] irreversibly inhibit the BTK enzyme. Conversely, noncovalent inhibitors, such as pirtobrutinib, reversibly inhibit the BTK enzyme [68, 69]. These inhibitors disrupt the B-cell signaling pathway, suppressing B-cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation, thereby affecting disease progression therapeutically. When combined with CAR-T therapy, BTK inhibitors enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy against malignant tumors by modulating T cell function and remodeling the tumor immune microenvironment.

Preclinical studies show that BTK inhibitors can enhance CAR-T cell expansion [70], reduce CD19 CAR-T cell depletion, prolong in vivo persistence, increase CD4 + and CD8 + effector memory T cells [71], promote T cell differentiation toward Th1 cells [72], decrease immunosuppressive cell populations in patients [73], and enhance cytotoxicity [74]. This effect is primarily achieved by inhibiting CD3ζ phosphorylation of CAR and downregulating genes related to the T-cell activation pathway [75], demonstrating a synergistic effect when co-administered. BTK inhibitors enhance CAR-T cell function, which is crucial for treating CLL. In in vivo animal models, combining CD19 CAR-T with ibrutinib achieves 80 ~ 100% long-term disease control. Adding ibrutinib to CAR-T cell-target cell co-cultures significantly reduces exhaustion marker expression, such as PD-1, TIM-3, LAG-3, and CTLA-4 [76], indicating CAR-T cell exhaustion reduction is key in enhancing anti-tumor efficacy in combination therapy.

Clinical studies demonstrate that administering BTK inhibitors before or concurrently with CAR-T infusion enhances clinical efficacy. Pre-treatment with BTK inhibitors reduces tumor size, decreases burden, and maintains a healthy immune microenvironment. Using CAR-T and BTK inhibitors concurrently suppresses in vivo CAR-T cell exhaustion, alleviates dysfunction, and improves expansion capacity [77]. Single-cell sequencing of 15 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receiving combined BTK inhibitor and CAR-T therapy revealed the importance of the HSP90-MYC-CDK9 axis in this treatment strategy [78]. Further research could investigate the functional characterization of this axis and its effect on treatment responses. In a single-center study, clinical efficacy was evaluated by combining BTK inhibitors with CAR-T cells. Nineteen patients who had received ibrutinib treatment for over 6 months without achieving CR underwent CD19 CAR-T therapy. The 3-month CRR was 44%, with 15 patients showing no detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) at 6 months. The overall survival rate at 48 months reached 84%, and the progression-free survival rate (PFS) was 70%. Thirteen patients maintained CR at the follow-up endpoint. Regarding safety, grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 20% of cases, while immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 26% [50]. These findings confirm the synergistic effect between CAR-T and BTK inhibitors, offering a novel treatment option with high and sustained remission rates. When CAR-T is administered concurrently with ibrutinib, CRS severity decreases, while ICANS occurrence remains comparable. Data indicate reduced cytokine release, including MCP-1 and IL-2a, among others, with IL-6 levels showing no significant difference from the CAR-T alone group. The 1-year PFS probabilities after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, with or without concurrent ibrutinib, were 38% and 50%, respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant [51]. This study discovered that combining CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and ibrutinib is well-tolerated and yields lasting therapeutic effects in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. Patients undergoing concurrent ibrutinib treatment have milder CRS severity and reduced serum cytokine concentrations during treatment. Moreover, no significant difference in PFS is observed compared to those solely on CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt-mTOR-c-myc signaling pathway is crucial in cancer and metabolic diseases due to its involvement in numerous protein-protein interactions and molecular crosstalk in B and T cells [79]. Studies show that adding PI3K inhibitors (PI3Ki), such as idelalisib (selective for PI3Kδ) [80] or duvelisib (a dual inhibitor of PI3Kδ and PI3Kγ), to in vitro cell experiments increases T cell numbers without hindering proliferation. Speculation suggests that PI3K inhibitors prevent PI3K-mediated cell apoptosis by blocking Fas signaling, thus inhibiting cell exhaustion [44]. During subsequent CAR-T cell manufacturing processes, incorporating duvelisib to create Duv-CART cells (CAR-T cells manufactured with duvelisib) resulted in a significant increase in CD8 + CAR-T cell number, accompanied by enhanced cytotoxicity. Bioinformatics analysis indicates that Duv-CART cells undergo epigenetic reprogramming toward stem cell-like properties. This includes upregulation of the mitochondrial fusion protein MFN2, along with increased expression of SIRT1 and TCF1/7. These changes enhance the efficacy of CAR-T cells against CLL both in vitro and in vivo [44]. Additionally, inhibiting PI3K increases stem cell central memory T cells (Tscm) and central memory T lymphocytes (Tcm) cell numbers, promoting cytotoxicity [44]. These findings underscore the crucial role of the PI3K signaling pathway in immune cell function and tumor immunity, providing valuable insights for new cancer immunotherapy strategies.

B cell lymphoma-2 antagonists

B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), a key regulator of apoptosis, belongs to the BCL-2 protein family [81], comprising two subtypes: BCL-2α and BCL-2β. The difference lies in BCL-2β lacking the transmembrane domain. This protein exerts strong antiapoptotic effects and is often overexpressed in various tumor cells, contributing significantly to cancer resistance and insensitivity [82]. Elevated BCL-2 levels promote cancer cell survival and growth, correlating with disease progression, metastasis, and adverse clinical outcomes across several malignancies [83,84,85,86], including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Studies indicate that BCL-2 overexpression can induce resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) [84]. Inhibiting BCL-2 activity or reducing BCL-2 protein levels can effectively promote apoptosis in malignant tumor cells and increase sensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [87]. Venetoclax, a BCL-2 antagonist, induces apoptosis in cancer cells overexpressing BCL-2 and is approved for patients contraindicated for frontline treatment with kinase inhibitors [88, 89]. Combining BCL-2 inhibitors with CAR-T cells is crucial for enhancing therapeutic efficacy against malignant tumors, warranting further exploration of their mechanisms of action.

Researchers investigated the effect of BCL-2 inhibitors on CAR-T cell immunotherapy in leukemia and lymphoma mouse models. They revealed, through targeted proapoptotic small molecule screening, that CAR-T cells alone achieved a killing rate of 47~63%, which increased to 75 ~ 88% when combined with BCL-2 inhibitors. This study showed that BCL-2 inhibitors enhance CAR-T cell cytotoxicity by enhancing Caspase-3/7 cleavage. However, higher doses and longer exposure times of venetoclax showed toxicity to CAR-T cells, reducing CD19 CAR-T cell numbers and inducing CAR-T cell apoptosis in the combination therapy compared to the CAR-T alone group. To address this, a venetoclax-resistant CAR-T cell was designed, targeting a specific point mutation at amino acid residue (Phe104Leu or F104L). In the MINO xenograft model, combining venetoclax with CART19-BCL-2 (F104L) achieved a 100% [45] survival rate with a cut-off of approximately 90 days. These findings underscore the potential of pairing BCL-2 inhibitors with CAR-T cell therapy and suggest strategies to mitigate venetoclax toxicity, offering valuable insights for optimizing CAR-T cell therapy further.

γ-secretase inhibitors

The BCMA on MM cell surfaces is activated by ligands BAFF and APRIL [90,91,92]. BCMA expression is regulated by γ-secretase (GS), which cleaves BCMA to release soluble BCMA (sBCMA), neutralizes APRIL, and inhibits BCMA-mediated NF-κB pathway activation. This process reduces target antigen density, affecting the targeted killing ability of CAR-T cells [93, 94]. Studies using in vitro cell experiments and MM NOD/SCID mouse models showed that γ-secretase inhibitors (GSI, LY3039478) dose-dependently prevent BCMA cleavage, increasing BCMA surface expression levels on MM cells. This enhancement improves the ability of CAR-T cells to recognize tumors [46].

Based on preclinical data, a clinical study was conducted by combining BCMA CAR-T with the γ-secretase inhibitor crenigacestat (LY3039478) for treating relapsed/refractory MM. The results showed that crenigacestat increased target antigen density and was well-tolerated [95]. γ-Secretase inhibitors enhance anti-BCMA CAR-T efficacy by preventing BCMA shedding from multiple myeloma cells.

Immunomodulatory drugs

The immunomodulator lenalidomide effectively combats hematological malignancies. Studies show that lenalidomide enhances the efficacy of CS1 CAR T cells [47] or BCMA CAR-T cells [49] in killing MM cells in vivo and in vitro when combined with CAR T cells. This effect is specifically illustrated as follows: (i) CD8 + CAR T cell subsets increased dose-dependently, while CD4 + CAR T cell subsets decreased [47]; (ii) After lenalidomide treatment on CAR T cells, autocrine cytokine IL-2 levels, which mainly determines CAR T cell efficacy and persistence, increased, and immunosuppressive Th2 cytokine levels (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) decreased [47]; (iii) Increasing CAR-T cell numbers [49]; (iv) Lenalidomide enhances immune synapse formation between CAR-T cells and tumors, increasing CAR-T cell lytic activity against tumors [47]. From these findings, the combination of lenalidomide and CAR-T cell therapy directly inhibits tumor-initiating cells and enhances the anti-tumor activity of CAR-T cells. Another study demonstrated that lenalidomide enhances the anti-tumor capacity of CAR-T cells by promoting CD8 + CAR-T cell differentiation into CD8 + central memory T cells and helper T cells [48], modulating the tumor microenvironment for enhanced CAR-T cell infiltration and delaying CAR-T cell depletion. Preclinical studies demonstrated that lenalidomide enhances the targeted-killing ability of CAR-T cells through various mechanisms, providing a solid foundation for further clinical trials.

A case report using piggyBac-generated CD19 CAR-T cells combined with lenalidomide to treat relapsed/refractory triple-hit DLBCL showed CR just 2 months after CAR-T cell infusion. Subsequently, they received lenalidomide maintenance therapy in the 4th month, maintaining CR for over 2 years [96]. Combining lenalidomide significantly extends the CR time. A study compared CAR-T therapy alone in nine patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL to seven patients treated with lenalidomide maintenance therapy post-CAR-T therapy. The lenalidomide maintenance therapy group showed significantly higher survival and overall remission rates than the CAR-T therapy alone group (1-year overall survival (OS) rate 100% vs. 33.3%, ORR 85.7% vs. 77.8%, CR 42.9% vs. 33.3%). Additionally, a patient who initially responded briefly to CAR-T treatment but later relapsed achieved CR after lenalidomide therapy. PCR analysis was used to detect an increase in the CAR-T cell count [52], suggesting that lenalidomide can reverse CAR-T decline. Combining lenalidomide with CAR-T in therapy has demonstrated safe and effective clinical effects, benefiting several patients with tumors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors

T cells primarily harbor immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIM-3. These immune inhibitory molecules are crucial for preventing damage to normal tissues but can lead to T-cell dysfunction, allowing tumor cells to evade immune system attacks, a primary factor in immune tolerance [97, 98]. PD-1, expressed on various immune cells such as activated T cells, NK cells, B lymphocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and monocytes, is a widely studied checkpoint molecule [37]. Its ligands, PD-L1/PD-L2, are predominantly overexpressed on tumor cell surfaces. When bound, they inhibit pathways such as PI3K/protein kinase B (Akt) and RAS/MEK/ERK, block protein kinase C-theta) function and glycolysis, and impede ZAP70 phosphatidylinositol signaling [99]. This inhibition compromises T cell function, allowing tumor cells to evade T cell attacks and promoting tumor growth. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors are commonly used in clinical practice to block inhibitory receptor-ligand interactions, effectively treating hematological malignancies. Combining CAR-T cell therapy with checkpoint inhibitors offers a strategy to enhance the survival rate of patients with cancer.

Combining CAR-T with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Cao et al. conducted a single-center study involving 11 patients with relapsed/refractory B-NHL who underwent CD19 CAR-T therapy combined with the PD-1 antibody nivolumab. The results confirmed the efficacy and safety of this combination, showing an overall remission rate of 81.81%, CRR of 45.45%, median PFS of 6 months, 75% incidence of grade 1–2 CRS, and 9% incidence of ICANS [53]. This combination demonstrates potent antitumor activity. Clinical data demonstrate that PD-1 blockade significantly enhances the anti-tumor effect. Co-expression of PD-1 and Eomes decreases on CAR-T cells, enhancing CAR-T cell expansion. This approach proves effective for patients with malignant tumors with limited CAR-T therapy response [100]. Another study retrospectively analyzed 154 patients who underwent CD19/CD22 CAR-T cell therapy with or without Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT). It assessed the PD-1 inhibitor used for subsequent maintenance therapy. The results showed that patients receiving CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy followed by PD-1 inhibitor maintenance had a higher ORR of 82.9% and a 2-year PFS rate of 59.8% than those not receiving PD-1 inhibitors (with an ORR of 60% and 2-year PFS rate of 21.3%). Among patients who underwent ASCT before CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy, no significant statistical difference in ORR and 2-year PFS was observed between the two groups [54]. This suggests that PD-1 inhibitors post CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy may benefit non-ACST patients. However, the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with ASCT could be influenced by other factors, such as the ACST efficacy.

The timing of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy affects CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy efficacy. Patients receiving durvalumab before CAR-T cell infusion show worse outcomes despite delayed and shorter CRS. Conversely, durvalumab maintenance post-CAR-T infusion enhances re-expansion, CAR-T cell numbers in the blood, and tumor cell killing [101]. Studies confirm the reliability of PD-L1 inhibitors combination therapy in terms of safety and efficacy. The combination therapy shows a 67% duration of response (DOR), exceeding the 20% DOR observed in patients receiving CAR-T therapy alone. The reduced efficacy observed with durvalumab before CAR-T therapy may be due to the early increase in soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) levels, which dose-dependently inhibit CAR-T cell effector function [102,103,104]. Clinically, careful timing of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy is crucial for effective intratumoral lesion targeting.

Interfering with the PD-1 gene in CAR-T cells

CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology can precisely interfere with the PD-1 gene by designing specific gRNAs to target the Cas9 protein targeted to the PD-1 gene. This induces mutations, insertions, or deletions in the genome, disrupting the function of PD-1 [105,106,107]. Alternative gene editing methods, such as Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases and Zinc Finger Nucleases [108], can also be used to cleave and edit the PD-1 gene. RNA molecules such as small interfering RNA [109] and short hairpin RNA [110, 111] are used to inhibit gene expression by targeting PD-1 mRNA, reducing PD-1 protein levels, and swiftly inhibiting PD-1 function, although not directly editing genes.

Constructing CAR-T cells secreting PD-1-blocking scFv

CAR-T cells modified with PD-1-blocking scFv were used in xenograft mouse models featuring PD-L1+ expression in hematological malignancies or solid tumors [112]. This modification increases cytotoxicity, promotes cytokine secretion, and enhances in vivo antitumor effects compared to unmodified CAR-expressing [113,114,115]. However, a significant limitation is that this PD-1 blockade targets only CAR-T cells, leaving PD-1 on T lymphocytes in patients still immunosuppressive.

Radiation therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) is effective for treating localized lesions in the hematologic system, including lymphoma and MM [116]. Combining CAR-T therapy with RT is a complex process but promises a treatment strategy [117, 118]. Radiotherapy induces immunostimulatory genes in lymphoma cells, enhancing signals for CAR-T cell activation and proliferation (CD70, OX40L) [119]. Gupta et al. noted that low-dose radiation (0.5–2.0 Gy) increased CD20 expression on Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines (Raji and Daudi) with low CD20 expression [120]. This elevated CD20 expression potentially enhances CAR-T treatment efficacy by providing more targets for subsequent CAR-T cells.

Before CD19 CAR-T (Axicabtagene ciloleucel) therapy for DLBCL, using RT as a bridging treatment showed manageable toxicity. 83% of patients had reduced lymphocyte counts, leading to an ORR of 81.8%. The CRR was 45%, indicating the safety and efficacy of using RT as a bridging treatment [56]. In a retrospective analysis of 83 cases involving relapsed/refractory B-NHL patients who received RT and CAR-T therapy, researchers found that 35 patients underwent bridging RT (bRT) before CAR-T infusion, while 48 underwent salvage RT (sRT) post-CAR-T infusion. The bRT group demonstrated an 84% local control rate, significantly higher than the 62% observed in the sRT group during efficacy assessment. Additionally, the bRT group had a significantly higher remission rate than the sRT group [55]. This suggests a relationship between bRT and the local control rate in patients, while sRT offers salvage options for patients who relapse post-CAR-T infusion. DeSelm et al. documented a case involving a relapsed/refractory DLBCL patient with tumor infiltration into the skin of the right lower leg who underwent CD19 CAR-T cell therapy after local radiotherapy as scheduled. The patient had positive PET-CT results 1 month post-treatment, no toxicity at the irradiated site, and grade 1 CRS without neurotoxicity. At the one-year follow-up, the irradiated area showed no disease progression, while other areas exhibited varying degrees of recurrence or progression [121]. In a clinical trial assessing bridging radiotherapy before BCMA CAR-T therapy, radiotherapy was deemed safe and viable as a bridging treatment, demonstrating lower hematological toxicity than the no-radiation group [57]. RT can enhance CAR-T cell recognition by damaging the DNA structure of tumor cells, controlling local tumor growth, and reducing tumor burden. Furthermore, RT may reduce immune escape mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment, such as immune inhibitory factor expression, potentially inducing tumor cell apoptosis and releasing tumor-associated antigens to enhance the immune system response. This strengthens the antitumor efficacy of CAR-T cells. Therefore, selecting the appropriate timing for radiation therapy is crucial in clinical practice.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematologic malignancies can achieve long-term remission or even potential cure through HSCT [122,123,124,125,126,127]. A recent study shows the efficacy of sequential CAR-T cell therapy post-HSCT. In a study of 42 patients undergoing sequential transplantation, the ORR reached 90.5%, with a 2-year PFS rate of 83.3%. Grade ≤ 3 CRS was observed in 4.8% of cases, while 21% experienced ICANS and 5% experienced severe grade 3 neurotoxicity [58]. Adverse reactions were reversible, indicating a high remission rate with a good safety profile. Additionally, researchers compared CAR-T therapy alone (Group A, eight patients) to sequential CAR-T therapy following ASCT (Group B, six patients, including two patients transitioning from Group A). The overall ORR at 3 months was 83.3%, with Group A having an ORR of 75% and Group B at 100% [59]. This study focused on relapsed/refractory double-hit lymphoma, showing that combining CAR-T with ASCT significantly increased survival, response rates, and duration of CAR-T persistence compared to CAR-T therapy alone while reducing adverse reactions and recurrence rates.

In patients with central nervous system lymphoma, combining ASCT with CAR-T cell therapy can enhance the prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma. Researchers analyzed 17 such cases, with 9 receiving only CAR-T cell therapy and 8 receiving ASCT combined with CAR-T cell therapy. The efficacy assessment revealed a CRR of 100% with CAR-T cell therapy combined with ASCT and 44.4% without ASCT. Compared to standalone CAR-T cell therapy, patients undergoing combined ASCT demonstrated significantly extended PFS and OS. The incidence rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS were 41% and 29%, respectively, with no treatment-related deaths reported [60], indicating manageable toxicity.

Patients with lymphoma that have TP53 mutations often have a worse prognosis, rendering enhancement of the efficacy in this disease subtype a key focus of clinical research. Studies show that combining CD19/22 CAR-T cell therapy with ASCT is more effective for patients with TP53 gene mutations, enhancing CRR, PFS, and OS. Clinical data from 60 patients with TP53-mutations showed that the objective response rate (ORR) was 87.1% and 92.9%, while CRR was 45.2% and 82.1% in the CAR-T alone and CAR-T combined with ASCT groups, respectively. The 24-month OS rates were 56.3% vs. 89.3% [61], indicating a significant improvement in patient outcomes with this combination therapy.

Combining CAR-T cell therapy with HSCT can be an effective and safe strategy for treating certain hematologic malignancies, leading to enhanced treatment outcomes and prognosis for specific patient subgroups. While some patients may experience adverse reactions, they are typically manageable, indicating the good safety profile of the combination therapy. However, further clinical research is necessary to establish the optimal treatment approach for different types of tumors and individual patients.

With thorough research and continuous advancements in CAR-T technology, combining CAR-T with other treatments has expanded its applicability and increased treatment options for patients with cancer. Research on various combination therapy strategies in the evolving treatment landscape is bringing new hope for clinical practice and patient well-being (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Combination Therapies with CAR-T Cells. ①Combining CAR-T cells with BTK inhibitors inhibits BTK in the B-cell signaling pathway, reducing malignant B-cell proliferation. ②Combining CAR-T cells with PI3K inhibitors interferes with tumor cell growth and survival by inhibiting the PI3K signaling pathway. ③Combining CAR-T cells with BCL-2 inhibitors promotes tumor cell apoptosis by inhibiting the BCL-2 protein. ④Combining CAR-T cells with GSI prevents the shedding of BCMA from the surface of tumor cells by inhibiting γ-secretase. ⑤Combining CAR-T cells with Lenalidomide recruits the E3 ubiquitin ligase CRL4CRBN, inducing the degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3. ⑥Combining CAR-T cells with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway to counteract the tumor cells’ immune evasion mechanism. ⑦Combining CAR-T cells with Radiotherapy directly kills tumor cells, enhancing the effectiveness of CAR-T therapy. ⑧Combining CAR-T cells with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation rebuilds the patient’s immune system to support the sustained anti-tumor activity of CAR-T cells.

Full size image

Conclusion

CAR-T cell therapy, an emerging cancer treatment modality, shows great promise in treating hematologic malignancies. However, some limitations, such as patient tolerance and post-treatment relapse, are associated with this strategy. To address these limitations, researchers are investigating combining CAR-T cell therapy with other treatment modalities to enhance therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects. Several studies on combination therapies have significantly advanced clinical effectiveness and reduced relapse rates in patients with relapsed/refractory. Detailed insights into combining CAR-T cells with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted drugs, radiotherapy, HSCT, and other treatments are provided in this study. These combination therapies enhance the anti-tumor effects of CAR-T cells and comprehensively target tumors through diverse mechanisms, improving patient response and survival rates. This offers novel insights and strategies for enhancing the clinical application of CAR-T cell therapy. Comparative reports on the safety and tolerability of different combination therapies are lacking, which is a potential starting point for future research to identify the most suitable combination therapy. Furthermore, optimizing protocols for CAR-T combination therapy is necessary to accommodate the diverse needs of patients, including timing, dosages, and post-treatment care. Further clinical studies are needed to validate the safety and efficacy of these combination treatment strategies. With continuous advancements in science, technology, and clinical experience, CAR-T cell combination therapy is expected to play an increasingly vital role in the future, improving treatment outcomes and survival prospects for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CAR:

Chimeric antigen receptor

CRR:

Complete remission rate

DLBCL:

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

MM:

Multiple myeloma

ORR:

Objective response rate

CR:

Complete remission

B-ALL:

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

HSCT:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BCMA:

B-cell maturation antigen

PD-1:

Programmed cell death protein-1

LAG-3:

Lymphocyte activation gene-3

TIM-3:

T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein-3

CTLA-4:

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4

CLL:

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

TAMS:

Tumor-associated macrophages

Tregs:

Regulatory T cells

BTK:

Bruton tyrosine kinase

MCL:

Mantle cell lymphoma

MRD:

Minimal residual disease

PFS:

Progression-free survival rate

CRS:

Cytokine release syndrome

ICANS:

Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome

PI3K:

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PI3Ki:

PI3K inhibitors

Tscm:

Stem cell central memory T cells

Tcm:

Central memory T lymphocytes

BCL-2:

B cell lymphoma-2

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

B-NHL:

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

CML:

Chronic myeloid leukemia

GS:

γ-secretase

GSI:

γ-secretase inhibitors

sBCMA:

Soluble BCMA

OS:

Overall survival

ORR:

Overall response rate

ASCT:

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

DOR:

Duration of response

sPD-L1:

Soluble PD-L1

scFv:

Single-chain variable fragments

RT:

Radiation therapy

bRT:

Bridging radiation therapy

sRT:

Salvage radiation therapy

References

  1. Levin A, Shah NN. Chimeric antigen receptor modified T cell therapy in B cell non-hodgkin lymphomas. Am J Hematol. 2019; 94(S1).

  2. Song EZ, Milone MC. Pharmacology of chimeric Antigen receptor–modified T cells. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021;61(1):805–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Rivière I. The Basic principles of chimeric Antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(4):388–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson CA, Hunter BD, Redd R, et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in the Non-trial setting: outcomes and correlates of response, resistance, and toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(27):3095–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Spiegel JY, Patel S, Muffly L, et al. CAR T cells with dual targeting of CD19 and CD22 in adult patients with recurrent or refractory B cell malignancies: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 2021;27(8):1419–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan T, Zhu L, Chen J. Current advances and challenges in CAR T-Cell therapy for solid tumors: tumor-associated antigens and the tumor microenvironment. Experimental Hematol Oncol. 2023;12(1):14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuster SJ, Tam CS, Borchmann P, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas (JULIET): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(10):1403–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schuster SJ, Svoboda J, Chong EA, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Refractory B-Cell Lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2545–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Munshi NC, Anderson D, Shah N, et al. Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Relapsed and Refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):705–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laetsch TW, Maude SL, Rives S, et al. Three-year update of Tisagenlecleucel in Pediatric and Young Adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the ELIANA Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(9):1664–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory large B-Cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-Cell therapy in relapsed or Refractory Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1331–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):839–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young adults with B-Cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):439–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson CA, Chavez JC, Sehgal R, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed or refractory indolent non-hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(1):91–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chong EA, Ruella M, Schuster SJ. Five-year outcomes for refractory B-Cell lymphomas with CAR T-Cell therapy. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(7):673–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, et al. Three-year Follow-Up of KTE-X19 in patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma, including high-risk subgroups, in the ZUMA-2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(3):555–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park JH, Wang X, Sauter C, et al. Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):449–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nastoupil LJ, Jain MD, Feng L, et al. Standard-of-care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory large B-Cell lymphoma: results from the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(27):3119–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sotillo E, Barrett DM, Black KL, et al. Convergence of acquired mutations and alternative splicing of CD19 enables resistance to CART-19 immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2015;5(12):1282–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Aparicio-Pérez C, Carmona M, Benabdellah K, et al. Failure of ALL recognition by CAR T cells: a review of CD19-negative relapses after anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment in B-ALL. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1165870.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Majzner RG, Mackall CL. Tumor Antigen escape from CAR T-cell therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(10):1219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gardner R, Wu D, Cherian S, et al. Acquisition of a CD19-negative myeloid phenotype allows immune escape of MLL-rearranged B-ALL from CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy. Blood. 2016;127(20):2406–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Evans AG, Rothberg PG, Burack WR, et al. Evolution to plasmablastic lymphoma evades CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Br J Haematol. 2015;171(2):205–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Majzner RG, Heitzeneder S, Mackall CL. Harnessing the Immunotherapy Revolution for the treatment of Childhood Cancers. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(4):476–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Rourke DM, Nasrallah MP, Desai A, et al. A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(399):eaaa0984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Grupp SA, Aplenc R, Teachey DT, et al. Chimeric Antigen receptor–modified T cells for Acute Lymphoid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(16):1509–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fry TJ, Shah NN, Orentas RJ, et al. CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy. Nat Med. 2018;24(1):20–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Orlando EJ, Han X, Tribouley C, et al. Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med. 2018;24(10):1504–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brudno JN, Maric I, Hartman SD, et al. T cells genetically modified to Express an Anti–B-Cell maturation Antigen chimeric Antigen receptor cause remissions of poor-prognosis relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(22):2267–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Stadtmauer EA, et al. B cell maturation antigen–specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(6):2210–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee H, Ahn S, Maity R, et al. Mechanisms of antigen escape from BCMA- or GPRC5D-targeted immunotherapies in multiple myeloma. Nat Med. 2023;29(9):2295–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Meng X, Liu X, Guo X, et al. FBXO38 mediates PD-1 ubiquitination and regulates anti-tumour immunity of T cells. Nature. 2018;564(7734):130–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aggarwal V, Workman CJ, Vignali DAA. LAG-3 as the third checkpoint inhibitor. Nat Immunol. 2023;24(9):1415–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Agarwal S, Aznar MA, Rech AJ, et al. Deletion of the inhibitory co-receptor CTLA-4 enhances and invigorates chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Immunity. 2023;56(10):2388–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang S, Liu D, Sun J, et al. Tim-3 regulates sepsis-induced immunosuppression by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway in CD4 T cells. Mol Ther. 2022;30(3):1227–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmadzadeh M, Johnson LA, Heemskerk B, et al. Tumor antigen–specific CD8 T cells infiltrating the tumor express high levels of PD-1 and are functionally impaired. Blood. 2009;114(8):1537–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Woo SR, Turnis ME, Goldberg MV, et al. Immune Inhibitory molecules LAG-3 and PD-1 synergistically regulate T-cell function to promote Tumoral Immune escape. Cancer Res. 2012;72(4):917–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fraietta JA, Lacey SF, Orlando EJ, et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):563–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Arner EN, Rathmell JC. Metabolic programming and immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2023;41(3):421–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Riaz N, Havel JJ, Makarov V et al. Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with NivolumabCell. 2017;171(4):934–49.

  42. Allen GM, Frankel NW, Reddy NR et al. Synthetic cytokine circuits that drive T cells into immune-excluded tumors. Science. 2022; 378(6625).

  43. Rafiq S, Hackett CS, Brentjens RJ. Engineering strategies to overcome the current roadblocks in CAR T cell therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(3):147–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Funk CR, Wang S, Chen KZ, et al. PI3Kδ/γ inhibition promotes human CART cell epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming to enhance antitumor cytotoxicity. Blood. 2022;139(4):523–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee YG, Guruprasad P, Ghilardi G, et al. Modulation of BCL-2 in both T Cells and Tumor Cells to enhance chimeric Antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy against Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2022;12(10):2372–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Pont MJ, Hill T, Cole GO, et al. γ-Secretase inhibition increases efficacy of BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2019;134(19):1585–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang X, Walter M, Urak R, et al. Lenalidomide enhances the function of CS1 chimeric Antigen receptor–redirected T cells against multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(1):106–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jin Z, Xiang R, Qing K, et al. Lenalidomide overcomes the resistance to third-generation CD19-CAR-T cell therapy in preclinical models of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cell Oncol. 2023;46(4):1143–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Works M, Soni N, Hauskins C, et al. Anti–B-cell maturation Antigen chimeric Antigen receptor T cell function against multiple myeloma is enhanced in the Presence of Lenalidomide. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18(12):2246–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gill S, Vides V, Frey NV, et al. Anti-CD19 CAR T cells in combination with ibrutinib for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022;6(21):5774–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Gauthier J, Hirayama AV, Purushe J, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of CD19-targeted CAR T cells with concurrent ibrutinib for CLL after ibrutinib failure. Blood. 2020;135(19):1650–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ping N, Qu C, Li M, et al. Overall survival benefits provided by lenalidomide maintenance after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Annals Translational Med. 2022;10(6):298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cao Y, Lu W, Sun R, et al. Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Combination with Nivolumab are safe and effective against Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell non-hodgkin Lymphoma. Front Oncol. 2019;9:767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Xin X, Zhu X, Yang Y et al. Efficacy of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor maintenance after chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-hodgkin-lymphoma. Cell Oncol. 2024.

  55. Saifi O, Breen WG, Lester SC, et al. Don’t put the CART before the horse: the role of Radiation Therapy in Peri-CAR T-cell therapy for aggressive B-cell Non-hodgkin Lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;116(5):999–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sim AJ, Jain MD, Figura NB, et al. Radiation Therapy as a bridging strategy for CAR T cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105(5):1012–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Manjunath SH, Cohen AD, Lacey SF, et al. The safety of bridging Radiation with Anti-BCMA CAR T-Cell therapy for multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(23):6580–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cao Y, Xiao Y, Wang N et al. CD19/CD22 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Cocktail Therapy following Autologous Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. 2021; 27(11): 910.e1-910.e11.

  59. Wei J, Mao Z, Wang N, et al. Long-term outcomes of relapsed/refractory double-hit lymphoma (r/r DHL) treated with CD19/22 CAR T-cell cocktail therapy. Clin Translational Med. 2020;10(5):e176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Xue F, Zheng P, Liu R et al. The Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation Combination-Based Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Improves Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Central Nervous System B-Cell Lymphoma. Journal of Oncology. 2022; 2022:2900310.

  61. Wei J, Xiao M, Mao Z, et al. Outcome of aggressive B-cell lymphoma with TP53 alterations administered with CAR T-cell cocktail alone or in combination with ASCT. Signal Transduct Target Therapy. 2022;7(1):101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang E, Mi X, Thompson MC, et al. Mechanisms of resistance to Noncovalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(8):735–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Honigberg LA, Smith AM, Sirisawad M, et al. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor PCI-32765 blocks B-cell activation and is efficacious in models of autoimmune disease and B-cell malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(29):13075–80.

  64. Gomez EB, Ebata K, Randeria HS, et al. Preclinical characterization of pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent (reversible) BTK inhibitor. Blood. 2023;142(1):62–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Brown JR, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, et al. Zanubrutinib or Ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(4):319–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Tam CS, Brown JR, Kahl BS, et al. Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(8):1031–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wu J, Zhang M, Liu D. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196): a selective second-generation BTK inhibitor. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Mato AR, Woyach JA, Brown R, et al. Pirtobrutinib after a covalent BTK inhibitor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(1):33–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mato AR, Shah NN, Jurczak W, et al. Pirtobrutinib in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies (BRUIN): a phase 1/2 study. Lancet. 2021;397(10277):892–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Fraietta JA, Beckwith KA, Patel PR, et al. Ibrutinib enhances chimeric antigen receptor T-cell engraftment and efficacy in leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(9):1117–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Long M, Beckwith K, Do P, et al. Ibrutinib treatment improves T cell number and function in CLL patients. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(8):3052–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Dubovsky JA, Beckwith KA, Natarajan G et al. Ibrutinib is an irreversible molecular inhibitor of ITK driving a Th1-selective pressure in T lymphocytes. 2013; 122(15):2539–49.

  73. Stiff A, Trikha P, Wesolowski R, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells Express Bruton’s tyrosine kinase and can be depleted in Tumor-Bearing hosts by Ibrutinib Treatment. Cancer Res. 2016;76(8):2125–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Fan F, Yoo HJ, Stock S, et al. Ibrutinib for improved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell production for chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(2):419–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Luo W, Li C, Wu J, et al. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors preserve anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell functionality and reprogram tumor micro-environment in B-cell lymphoma. Cytotherapy. 2023;25(7):739–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Ruella M, Kenderian SS, Shestova O, et al. The addition of the BTK inhibitor Ibrutinib to Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (CART19) improves responses against Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(11):2684–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Qin JS, Johnstone TG, Baturevych A, et al. Antitumor Potency of an Anti-CD19 chimeric Antigen receptor T-Cell therapy, Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in Combination with Ibrutinib or Acalabrutinib. J Immunother. 2020;43(4):107–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Yan F, Jiang V, Jordan A, et al. The HSP90-MYC-CDK9 network drives therapeutic resistance in mantle cell lymphoma. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024;13(1):14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Abu Eid R, Ahmad S, Lin Y, et al. Enhanced therapeutic efficacy and memory of Tumor-Specific CD8 T cells by Ex vivo PI3K-δ inhibition. Cancer Res. 2017;77(15):4135–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Zheng W, O’Hear CE, Alli R, et al. PI3K orchestration of the in vivo persistence of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Leukemia. 2018;32(5):1157–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Delbridge AR, Strasser A. The BCL-2 protein family, BH3-mimetics and cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(7):1071–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Fujita N, Tsuruo T. In vivo veritas: Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL mediate tumor cell resistance to chemotherapy. Drug Resist Updat. 2000;3(3):149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Goff DJ, Recart C, Sadarangani A, et al. A Pan-BCL2 inhibitor renders bone-marrow-Resident Human leukemia stem cells sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibition. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(3):316–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Letai A, Sorcinelli MD, Beard C, et al. Antiapoptotic BCL-2 is required for maintenance of a model leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2004;6(3):241–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lee J, Sohn EJ, Yoon SW, et al. Anti-metastatic effect of Dehydrocorydaline on H1299 Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma cells via inhibition of Matrix metalloproteinases and B Cell Lymphoma 2: Antimetastatic Effect of Dehydrocorydaline on H1299 cells. Phytother Res. 2017;31(3):441–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Delbridge AR, Grabow S, Strasser A, et al. Thirty years of BCL-2: translating cell death discoveries into novel cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(2):99–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Davids MS, Letai A. Targeting the B-Cell Lymphoma/Leukemia 2 family in Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(25):3127–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. DiNardo CD, Pratz K, Pullarkat V, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2019;133(1):7–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Pollyea DA, Stevens BM, Jones CL, et al. Venetoclax with azacitidine disrupts energy metabolism and targets leukemia stem cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Med. 2018;24(12):1859–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Yu G, Boone T, Delaney J, et al. APRIL and TALL-1 and receptors BCMA and TACI: system for regulating humoral immunity. Nat Immunol. 2000;1(3):2526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Meinl E, Thaler FS, Lichtenthaler SF. Shedding of BAFF/APRIL receptors controls B cells. Trends Immunol. 2018;39(9):6736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Schneider P. The role of APRIL and BAFF in lymphocyte activation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17(3):282–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Laurent SA, Hoffmann FS, Kuhn PH, et al. γ-secretase directly sheds the survival receptor BCMA from plasma cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Yuan X, Wu H, Xu H, et al. Notch signaling: an emerging therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 2015;369(1):20–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Mailankody S, Matous JV, Chhabra S, et al. Allogeneic BCMA-targeting CAR T cells in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: phase 1 UNIVERSAL trial interim results. Nat Med. 2023;29(2):422–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Li C, Sun Y, Wang J, et al. PiggyBac-Generated CAR19-T cells plus Lenalidomide cause durable complete remission of triple-hit Refractory/Relapsed DLBCL: a Case Report. Front Immunol. 2021;12:599493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. McLane LM, Abdel-Hakeem MS, Wherry EJ. CD8 T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection and Cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37:457–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Speiser DE, Ho PC, Verdeil G. Regulatory circuits of T cell function in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(10):599–611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Ok CY, Young KH. Targeting the programmed death-1 pathway in lymphoid neoplasms. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;54:99–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Chong EA, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, et al. PD-1 blockade modulates chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)–modified T cells: refueling the CAR. Blood. 2017;129(8):1039–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Hirayama AV, Kimble EL, Wright JH, et al. Timing of anti-PD-L1 antibody initiation affects efficacy/toxicity of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2024;8(2):453–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Lu L, Risch E, Halaban R, et al. Dynamic changes of circulating soluble PD-1/PD-L1 and its association with patient survival in immune checkpoint blockade-treated melanoma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;118:110092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Oh SY, Kim S, Keam B, et al. Soluble PD-L1 is a predictive and prognostic biomarker in advanced cancer patients who receive immune checkpoint blockade treatment. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):19712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Chen L, Liu S, Adah D, et al. Soluble programmed death ligand-1-induced immunosuppressive effects on chimeric antigen receptor-natural killer cells targeting Glypican-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Immunology. 2023;169(2):204–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Liu X, Zhang Y, Cheng C, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated multiplex gene editing in CAR-T cells. Cell Res. 2017;27(1):154–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Rupp LJ, Schumann K, Roybal KT, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances anti-tumor efficacy of human chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):737.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Hu W, Zi Z, Jin Y, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances human mesothelin-targeted CAR T cell effector functions. Cancer Immunol Immunotherapy. 2019;68(3):365–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Huang R, Li X, He Y, et al. Recent advances in CAR-T cell engineering. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Hamilton AG, Swingle KL, Joseph RA, et al. Ionizable lipid nanoparticles with Integrated Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for mRNA CAR T cell Engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(30):2301515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Cherkassky L, Morello A, Villena-Vargas J, et al. Human CAR T cells with cell-intrinsic PD-1 checkpoint blockade resist tumor-mediated inhibition. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(8):3130–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Ouyang W, Jin SW, Xu N, et al. PD-1 downregulation enhances CAR-T cell antitumor efficiency by preserving a cell memory phenotype and reducing exhaustion. J Immunother Cancer. 2024;12(4):e008429.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Suarez ER, Chang DK, Sun J, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells secreting anti-PD-L1 antibodies more effectively regress renal cell carcinoma in a humanized mouse model. Oncotarget. 2016;7(23):34341–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Li S, Siriwon N, Zhang X, et al. Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy by chimeric Antigen receptor–modified T cells Engineered to secrete checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(22):6982–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Chen X, Yang S, Li S, et al. Secretion of bispecific protein of anti-PD-1 fused with TGF-β trap enhances antitumor efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy. Mol Therapy Oncolytics. 2021;21:144–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Chen J, Zhu T, Jiang G, et al. Target delivery of a PD-1-TREM2 scFv by CAR-T cells enhances anti-tumor efficacy in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Son SH, Choi BO, Kim GW, et al. Primary Radiation Therapy in patients with localized Orbital marginal zone B-Cell lymphoma of Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(1):86–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Zhang Z, Liu X, Chen D, et al. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: the dawn of cancer treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Fang PQ, Gunther JR, Wu SY, et al. Radiation and CAR T-cell therapy in Lymphoma: future frontiers and potential opportunities for Synergy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:648655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Lindgren T, Stigbrand T, Riklund K, et al. Gene expression profiling in MOLT-4 cells during gamma-radiation-induced apoptosis. Tumor Biology. 2012;33(3):689–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Gupta D, Crosby ME, Almasan A, et al. Regulation of CD20 expression by radiation-induced changes in intracellular redox status. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44(4):614–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. DeSelm C, Palomba ML, Yahalom J, et al. Low-dose Radiation Conditioning enables CAR T cells to mitigate Antigen escape. Mol Ther. 2018;26(11):2542–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Chang YJ, Wang Y, Liu YR, et al. Haploidentical allograft is superior to matched sibling donor allograft in eradicating pre-transplantation minimal residual disease of AML patients as determined by multiparameter flow cytometry: a retrospective and prospective analysis. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Chang YJ, Wang Y, Xu P, et al. Haploidentical donor is preferred over matched sibling donor for pre-transplantation MRD positive ALL: a phase 3 genetically randomized study. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Wang Y, Liu QF, Xu LP, et al. Haploidentical versus matched-sibling transplant in adults with Philadelphia-negative high-risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: a biologically phase III randomized study. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(14):3467–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Wang Y, Liu QF, Xu LP, et al. Haploidentical vs identical-sibling transplant for AML in remission: a multicenter, prospective study. Blood. 2015;125(25):3956–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Hourigan CS, Dillon LW, Gui G, et al. Impact of conditioning intensity of allogeneic transplantation for Acute myeloid leukemia with genomic evidence of residual disease. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(12):1273–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Zhang X, Chen J, Han MZ, et al. The consensus from the Chinese Society of Hematology on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 2021 update. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The figures are created with BioRender.com.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82070213, No. 82370196).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China

    Delian Zhou, Xiaojian Zhu & Yi Xiao

Authors
  1. Delian Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaojian Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, YX and XJZ; Writing – Original Draft, DLZ; Writing – Review & Editing, DLZ, YX and XJZ; Funding Acquisition, YX. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaojian Zhu or Yi Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, D., Zhu, X. & Xiao, Y. CAR-T cell combination therapies in hematologic malignancies. Exp Hematol Oncol 13, 69 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-024-00536-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-024-00536-0

Keywords

Experimental Hematology & Oncology

ISSN: 2162-3619

Contact us