Skip to main content

Bispecific antibodies and dual-targeting CAR-T cells for multiple myeloma: latest updates from the 2023 ASCO annual meeting

A Correction to this article was published on 03 October 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and dual-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells have been employed in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients over the past few years, as an increasing number of patients were ineffectively treated by ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. BCMA/CD3 and GPRC5D/CD3 are the most popular combinations. Clinical findings indicated that patients exhibit a greater susceptibility to stronger and more enduring responses. Here, we summarize the latest data from the 2023 ASCO annual meeting on BsAbs targeting BCMA/CD3, GPRC5D/CD3 and BCMA/CD19 CAR T cells.

To the editor

Although the outcome of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has significantly improved in recent years, a large proportion of patients treated with immunotherapy relapse [1]. However, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells have shown good efficacy and safety in clinical scenarios [2] and can provide strong and durable responses [3]. This review summarizes the latest updates from the 2023 ASCO meeting.

Bispecific antibodies

One poster reported the efficacy of the commercial drug teclistamab, the first BCMA/CD3 BsAb that received FDA approval for the treatment of RRMM. All patients were triple class refractory (TCR), 80% were penta-drug refractory, and ten had prior anti-BCMA therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 60% (9/15), and Grade 1–2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 41% of patients [4].

Elranatamab is another BCMA/CD3 BsAb. It had the longest median follow-up (15 months) among all phase 2 trials of this type of BsAb. In total, 123 patients received elranatamab therapy. Of these, 96.7% and 42.3% of patients were triple class and penta-drug refractory, respectively. The ORR (objective response rate) was 61%, and the duration of response (DOR) at 12 months (mo) was 74.1% [5].

The efficacy of linvoseltamab, a BCMA/CD3 BsAb, was demonstrated in an oral abstract. In two cohorts (200 mg vs. 50 mg), the ORR was 64% and 50%, while the incidence of Grade 1–2 CRS was 36% and 51%, respectively [6].

A phase I trial assessing the safety and preliminary efficacy of F182112, a BCMA/CD3 BsAb, was presented at this meeting. Sixteen patients were enrolled in this clinical study. The ORR was 43.8%, and the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were CRS (81%), which were all Grade 1–2 [7].

The MonumenTAL-1 trial focused on investigating the efficacy and safety of talquetamab, a GPRC5D/CD3 BsAb. The ORR was 74%, 73% and 63% in the 0.4 mg/kg QW, 0.8 mg/kg Q2W, and other dose (some patients with prior T-cell redirection therapy received either dose) cohorts, respectively. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.5, 11.9 (61% censored), and 5.1 mo, respectively. The AEs were all clinically manageable [8].

The first results from the RedirecTT-1 study were presented at the 2023 ASCO meeting. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of the combination of two BsAbs, teclistamab (tec) targeting BCMA/CD3 and talquetamab (tal) targeting GPRC5D/CD3, simultaneously. The ORRs among evaluable patients and evaluable patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) were 84% (52/62) and 73% (19/26), the rates of CR or better (≥ CR) were 34% (21/62) and 31% (8/26), respectively. The ORR was 92% (12/13) in evaluable patients and 83% (5/6) in evaluable patients with EMD at the recommended phase 2 regimen (RP2R). The rate of CR or better (≥ CR) was 31% (4/13) and 33% (2/6), respectively, and AEs were manageable [9].

Another combination treatment was tal + daratumumab in the TRIMM-2 study. The ORR was 78% and it showed strong and durable responses with an mPFS of 19.4 mo in heavily pretreated RRMM patients. The 12-mo PFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 76% and 93%, respectively. In addition, the safety profile was acceptable [10].

In addition to all of the above trials, Shaji Kumar is conducting research to investigate the efficacy and safety of cevostamab, which targeted FcRH5 and CD3, in TCR RRMM patients in the CAMMA 2 study [11]. Relevant patient recruitment is currently in progress, although no empirical data have been obtained at this stage.

Dual-targeting CAR-T cells

Previous results demonstrated that GC012F treatment led to a strong and durable response in RRMM patients. The same team provided updated trial data at the 2023 ASCO meeting (Abstract No. 8005). At the time of data cutoff, the ORR was 93.1%, and the rates of stringent complete response (sCR) and very good partial response (VGPR) were 82.8% (24/29) and 89.7% (26/29), respectively. All patients (29/29) achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (flow cytometry at 10− 4-10− 6), and the MRD-sCR rate was 82.8% (24/29) across all dose levels. The mDOR was 37.0 mo (95% CI, 11.0-NR), and the mPFS was 38.0 mo (95% CI, 11.8-NR). This encouraging outcome demonstrated that GC012F can further increase the clinical benefit to RRMM patients [12].

Data Availability

The material supporting the conclusion of this study has been included within the article.

Change history

Abbreviations

CAR:

Chimeric antigen receptor

RRMM:

Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

TCR:

Triple-class refractory

BsAb:

Bispecific antibody

GPRC5D:

G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member D

ORR:

Overall response rate/objective response rate

RP2R:

Recommended phase 2 regimen

AEs:

Adverse events

CRS:

Cytokine release syndrome

DOR:

Duration of response

EMD:

Extramedullary disease

sCR:

Stringent complete response

FcRH5:

Fc receptor-homolog 5

References

  1. Kegyes D, Constantinescu C, Vrancken L, Rasche L, Gregoire C, Tigu B, et al. Patient selection for CAR T or BiTE therapy in multiple myeloma: which treatment for each patient? J Hematol Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01296-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tian Z, Liu M, Zhang Y, Wang X. Bispecific T cell engagers: an emerging therapy for management of hematologic malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01084-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk N, Nahi H, San-Miguel JF, Oriol A, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple Myeloma.N Engl. J Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2203478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Firestone R, Shekarkhand T, Patel D, Tan CRC, Hultcrantz M, Lesokhin AM, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of commercial teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to anti-BCMA therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohty M, Tomasson MH, Arnulf B, Bahlis NJ, Prince HM, Niesvizky R, et al. Elranatamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): extended follow up and biweekly administration from the MagnetisMM-3 study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee HC, Bumma N, Richter JR, Dhodapkar MV, Hoffman JE, Suvannasankha A, et al. LINKER-MM1 study: Linvoseltamab (REGN5458) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun MY, Qiu LG, Wei YQ, Jin J, Li X, Liu X, et al. Results from a first-in-human phase I study of F182112, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schinke CD, Touzeau C, Minnema MC, Donk NWCJvd, Rodríguez-Otero P, Mateos M-V, Rasche L, et al. Pivotal phase 2 MonumenTAL-1 results of talquetamab (tal), a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody (BsAb), for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen YC, Morillo D, Gatt ME, Sebag M, Kim K, Min C-K, Oriol A, et al. First results from the RedirecTT-1 study with teclistamab (tec) + talquetamab (tal) simultaneously targeting BCMA and GPRC5D in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dholaria BR, Weisel K, Mateos M-V, Goldschmidt H, Martin TG, Morillo D, et al. Talquetamab (tal) + daratumumab (dara) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated TRIMM-2 results. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar S, Bachier CR, Cavo M, Corradini P, Delforge M, Janowski W, et al. CAMMA 2: a phase I/II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of cevostamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have triple-class refractory disease and have received a prior anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) agent. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):TPS8064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Du J, Fu W-J, Jiang H, Dong B, Gao L, Liu L, et al. Updated results of a phase I, open-label study of BCMA/CD19 dual-targeting fast CAR-T GC012F for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study is partly supported by funding from the 2020 Top Young Talents from the Central Plains.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LQD and HJX wrote the original manuscript. All authors participated in the process of reviewing and revising the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quande Lin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable for this summary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable for this summary.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional file 1

: Table 1. Properties of bispecific antibodies for multiple myeloma. Table 2. Outcomes of clinical trials of single-agent bispecific antibodies or combination therapy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, J., Li, Y. & Lin, Q. Bispecific antibodies and dual-targeting CAR-T cells for multiple myeloma: latest updates from the 2023 ASCO annual meeting. Exp Hematol Oncol 12, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-023-00436-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-023-00436-9

Keywords