Skip to main content

The gut microbiota as a booster for radiotherapy: novel insights into radio-protection and radiation injury


Approximately 60–80% of cancer patients treated with abdominopelvic radiotherapy suffer post-radiotherapy toxicities including radiation enteropathy and myelosuppression. Effective preventive and therapeutic strategies are lacking for such radiation injury. The gut microbiota holds high investigational value for deepening our understanding of the pathogenesis of radiation injury, especially radiation enteropathy which resembles inflammatory bowel disease pathophysiology and for facilitating personalized medicine by providing safer therapies tailored for cancer patients. Preclinical and clinical data consistently support that gut microbiota components including lactate-producers, SCFA-producers, indole compound-producers and Akkermansia impose intestinal and hematopoietic radio-protection. These features serve as potential predictive biomarkers for radiation injury, together with the microbial diversity which robustly predicts milder post-radiotherapy toxicities in multiple types of cancer. The accordingly developed manipulation strategies including selective microbiota transplantation, probiotics, purified functional metabolites and ligands to microbe-host interactive pathways are promising radio-protectors and radio-mitigators that merit extensive validation in clinical trials. With massive mechanistic investigations and pilot clinical trials reinforcing its translational value the gut microbiota may boost the prediction, prevention and mitigation of radiation injury. In this review, we summarize the state-of-the-art landmark researches related with radio-protection to provide illuminating insights for oncologists, gastroenterologists and laboratory scientists interested in this overlooked complexed disorder.


As the largest symbiotic reservoir in the human body, the gut harbors a plethora of microorganisms and functional genes, molecules and metabolites, which make up the gut microbiota of high research value in the pathophysiology of the host, especially in aspects of inflammation, metabolism and immunomodulation. Recently, groundbreaking studies on the gut microbiota influencing the anticancer immune response have generated widespread interest in this “secondary organ” in the field of oncology. The addition of “polymorphic microbiomes” to the newest version of cancer hallmarks [1] also highlights its importance in tumorigenesis.

Radiotherapy is a compulsory modality for over 50% of all cancer patients with a curative role in 25% of cancers [2], by precisely delivering high-energy ionizing radiation to eradicate malignant cells. However, enterocytes and hematopoietic cells are also highly sensitive to radiation because of their rapid renewal rates. Despite advanced delivery techniques to protect normal tissues, toxicities including radiation enteropathy (RE) and myelosuppression are common in patients treated with radiotherapy for abdominopelvic tumors. It is estimated that over half of all cancer survivors are patients with abdominopelvic tumors, and approximately 60–80% of those receiving abdominopelvic radiotherapy develop varying degrees of acute RE within three months from the first radiation, while 5–20% of them later develop chronic RE [2, 3]. This estimation is conservative due to unsatisfactory follow-up, and the prevalence of post-radiotherapy gastrointestinal dysfunction is believed to exceed that of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in US [2]. Although acute RE is self-limited, severe symptoms such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance and enteric infection occurring in neutropenic cases can lead to treatment suspension and even death. Delayed symptoms like chronic blood loss and severe stricture or perforation, are irreversible and life-threatening occasionally, which constitute major dose-limiting factors for radiotherapy. Concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy and biotherapy further exacerbate the toxicities, impede completion of therapy and compromise tumor control. Therefore, radio-protection deserves high attention to ensure safety, efficacy and adherence of radiotherapy.

However, no reliable predictive tools or preventive strategies have been established currently for radiation injury. Symptomatic treatment remains the mainstream salvage option. Amifostine is the only medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for preventing radiation-induced toxicity, whereas severe collateral side effects and narrow efficacy time window limit its widespread use [2]. To our knowledge, the gut microbiota is an area with intensive research to address the unmet needs of radio-protection. Reviews focusing on the interplay between gut microbiota and gastrointestinal mucositis induced by radiotherapy or chemotherapy have been published yet neither covering microbial influences on hematopoietic impairment nor a summary of mechanistic insights. To fill in the knowledge gap and to promote deeper understanding on the radiation injury pathogenesis for designing novel predictive, prophylactic and therapeutic strategies, we reviewed updated studies in this field especially mechanism-driven laboratory findings. For the convenience of the readership, the definitions of important terms in this review are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Definitions of key terms

Preclinical evidence links the gut microbiota to radiation injury

Causal linkage established from deprivation, supplementation and interventional assays

Elegantly-designed experimental studies establish the strong linkage between the gut microbiota and radiation injury. Resistance to lethal dose total body radiation (TBI) in germ-free mice compared to conventionally-raised mice has been reported since 1950s [4]. In line with this finding, pre-treatment with antibiotics to clear the gut microbiota also significantly improves survival in mice exposed to sublethal dose TBI [5] and accelerates recovery of oral mucositis after snout radiation [6]. Moreover, Fan et al.conducted a series of works by introducing a third factor which interacts with the gut microbiota and thus affects radio-sensitivity of normal tissues to reveal the bridging role of gut microbiota in radiation injury. In their reports, circadian rhythm disturbances [7] and food additive polysorbate-80 [8] disturbing the gut microbiota lead to radiation injury deterioration. Whereas modified diets [9, 10], anti-cholesterol agent simvastatin [9] and anti-oxidant molecules [11,12,13,14] mitigate radiation injury in a microbiota-dependent manner. Noteworthy, a series of gender-specific phenotypes in relation with gut microbiota interplaying with radiation injury is repeatedly reported in Fan’s animal models [5, 9, 10]whose underlying mechanism is unclear. Whether similar manifestations exist in human as a possible explanation for the sex differences in treatment efficacy and toxicity [15] remain to be investigated. Nevertheless, such a phenomenon reminds us that gender is of concern in unravelling the role of gut microbiota in radiation injury. We summarize the animal models used in experimental studies (Table 2), noticing that most studies chose male CB57BL/J6 (B6) mice in this field.

Table 2 Preclinical studies establishing the cause-and-effect role of gut microbiota in radiation injury

In addition to associations from deprivation and interventional assays, selective microbiota supplementation assays provide more robust evidence. For example, mono-association experiments revealed that Fusobacterium sp., Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas sp. respectively contributes to radiation injury augmentation, whereas Clostridium sp., Bifidobacterium pseudolongum and Lactobacillus acidophilus contributes to injury amelioration [16]. Furthermore, repeated transplantations of feaces from gender-matched healthy mice after radiation efficiently mitigate intestinal and hematopoietic toxicity by enhancing angiogenesis and maintaining gut barrier integrity of the radiated mice [5]. On the other hand, transplantation of dysbiosis feaces from radiated mice [17] or from polysorbate-80-treated mice [8] before radiation transmits susceptibility to radiation injury to the recipients.

Reinforced predictive and prognostic value by microbial dynamics during radiation

Compared to cross-sectional studies, repeated sampling in a longitudinal design has higher statistical power, and some studies associate the microbial dynamics throughout radiotherapy with radio-dosimetry [18,19,20,21,22] and radiation injury [17, 23,24,25]. Reportedly, abdominal dose of  > 1.5 Gy is a risk factor of RE and the dose threshold for gastrointestinal lining loss is 6 Gy [26]. The threshold for hematopoietic dysfunction is 0.5 Gy and the exquisitely radio-sensitive lymphocytes are maximally depressed when exposed to radiation of ~ 2 Gy, which is the standard fractionated regimen adopted in the clinic [27]. According to historic reports and our clinical experience, patients typically present gastrointestinal symptoms since the first or second week of radiotherapy [26] and may develop progressive myelosuppression almost immediately within the first week of radiotherapy [27]. Therefore, timely identification of high-risk population (> 2 Gy absorbed dose) in need of medical intervention is critical both for ensuring safety of radiotherapy in clinical settings and for appropriate allocation of medical resources after accidental nuclear exposure. To this end, Lam et al. [19] developed two indices respectively named as “acute ratio”, which climbs within the first week after radiation, and “chronic ratio” which increases from the second till the third week, based on murine faecal microbes whose abundances are significantly and persistently altered after TBI. The two indices effectively determine exposure to single-fraction of 10 Gy radiation and multiple-fractions of 18 Gy/6Fx radiation. Interested in the feasibility of microbiota as radio-dosimetry, Tian’s group [20] using rodent models reported linear correlations between radiation dose and microbial abundances measured at day 3.5 following radiation, including negative association with Eubacterium xylanophilum and positive association with Escherichia Shigella (p-value = 0.046 and 0.026, respectively). These microbial abundances also parallel with the post-radiation lethality and intestinal histopathologic features. Likewise, Carbonero et al. [21] found in minipig and macaque models significant correlations between radiation dose and microbial abundances measured at day 3 following TBI, including the positive association with butyrate-producing Clostridium XIVa as well as the negative association with Prevotella, and the abundance of Prevotella is suggested as a potential positive prognostic biomarker of post-radiation survival.

A further step made by Epperly et al. [25] is the inclusion of microbiota information into post-radiation survival models which efficiently improves the predictability. They set the repeatedly measured microbiota abundances as time-varying covariates combined with static covariates of several radiation mitigators including granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), programmed cell death inhibitors JP4-039, necrostatin-1 and baicalein in a Cox proportional hazards model. Results showed that both the abundance of Lactobacillus (HR = 0.15, p-value = 0.001) and butyrate-producing Ruminococcus (HR = 0.85, p-value = 0.04) are independently robust predictors of increased survival, whose addition into the model improves the concordance index, even outweighing the significance of therapeutic G-CSF or the triple regimen of JP4-039/baicalein/necrostatin-1 (p-value = 0.08 and 0.09, respectively). Surprisingly, abundance of Akkermansia is a deleterious predictor of survival (HR = 2, p-value = 0.046) in experiments incorporating G-CSF although the prognostic value of Akkermansia is insignificant in experiments using programmed cell death inhibitors only. Given the marginally significantly decrease in Akkermansia in survivors treated with G-CSF, the possibility that the interplay between Akkermansia and G-CSF renders this microbe the unexpected correlation with radiation-induced death needs to be clarified.

To summarize, preclinical results strongly support that the gut microbiota is closely involved into the development of radiation injury. Of note, over 96% of the microbial biomarkers identified in murine faeces have been matched to genera existing in human [19], highlighting the translational value of these laboratory results.

Bench to bedside: harnessing the gut microbiota to screen out high-risk patients

In clinical practice, radiotherapy-induced toxicity depends on radiation doses, irradiated volumes of normal tissues, fractionation regimens, radiation techniques, concurrent medications and host factors [2]. Yet most animal experiments used total-body or total-abdominal irradiation at single- dose which barely resembles the clinical situations. Therefore, to validate the laboratory findings and accordingly develop predictive strategies for radiation injury risk in multiple types of cancer are necessary and translationally inspiring.

Gynecological cancer

Two small-sample-size studies [28, 29] incorporating mixed cohorts of gynecological, colorectal and anal cancers first contributed to this field by presenting that pre-existing faecal microbiota features help identify patients predisposed to acute radiation-induced diarrhea, and that patients who prone to develop diarrhea have lower Shannon diversity index (SDI) and higher Firmicute/Bacteroides ratio in their baseline faecal specimens compared to those who do not. Two subsequent studies with uniform cohorts of cervical cancer patients confirmed that dysbiosis in the baseline faecal specimens from patients prone to acute RE is featured with significantly reduced α diversity (including SDI) and increased β diversity [30], and that increased SDI is an independent predictor for better near-term gastrointestinal function, when all timepoints data were analyzed together [31]. However, no association between the α diversity and occurrence of chronic RE is found in another mixed cohort of 59 patients [32], which emphasizes further microbiota exploration on the chronic RE in larger-sample-size uniform cohorts. A translational contribution deserving attention is the establishment of the first model for predicting Grade2 acute RE in a cohort of 17 gynecological cancer patients based on microbial features measured after radiotherapy [33], whose area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) metric reaches 0.87, indicating robust predictive performance.

Prostate cancer

In prostate cancer patients, Ferreira et al. [34] also observed a trend towards lower α diversity (Chao index) after radiotherapy in both acute and chronic symptomatic patients compared to their non-symptomatic counterparts despite that SDI was not analyzed. Compositionally, patients with acute and chronic RE symptoms are both rich in short chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producers, including Clostridium IV, Roseburia and Phascolarctobacterium whose abundances all significantly correlate positively with the elevated acute symptoms and all demonstrate more drastic post-radiotherapy decline in patients with persistent symptoms. Overabundances of Roseburia is even an independent predictor of occurrences of severe chronic RE. Moreover, the SCFA-producers negatively correlate with IL-15 and positively correlate with eotaxin in rectal mucosal tissues sampled from chronic RE patients, indicating an inflammation regulatory role for these microbes. Functionally, there also exists an increasing trend of butyrate metabolism and propionate metabolism associated with aggravating acute symptoms, whereas fatty acid metabolism significantly reduces with aggravating chronic symptoms.

Anorectal cancer

According to a small-sample-size pilot study on rectal cancer [35], the SCFA-producing family Lachnospiraceae belonging to Clostridia class and the lactate-producing Bifidobacterium are overrepresented in patients with milder acute diarrhea compared to the severe counterparts. A subsequent expanded analysis showed that the microbial diversity (including SDI) negatively correlates with the severity of both myelosuppression [36] and chronic gastrointestinal toxicity significantly (data not published), and non-significantly with acute gastrointestinal toxicity [36]. Compositionally, Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Coprococcus eutactus are overrepresented at baseline in patients with milder myelosuppression and in patients with milder acute gastrointestinal toxicity, respectively compared to their corresponding severe groups; whereas β-glucuronidase-producing microbes including Escherichia fergusonii related with reactivation of the irinotecan end-product, SN38G, are overrepresented in patients with severe myelosuppression and in patients with severe acute gastrointestinal toxicity compared to the mild counterparts [36]. Established on the abundances of discriminative microbes measured prior to radiotherapy, toxicity prediction classifiers perform inspiringly with the AUC for predicting Grade2 + myelosuppression reaching 0.89, and that for predicting Grade3 + acute gastrointestinal toxicity reaching 0.86. Another study on anal squamous cell cancer [37] revealed a trend towards higher baseline microbial diversity (including SDI) in patients predisposing to Grade 2 + acute anal dermatitis compared to their Grade 0–1 counterparts, with Pielou evenness reaching significance. There is no significant association between severity of acute RE with microbial diversity. However, Clostridia class and Clostridiales order are enriched at baseline in patients with severe acute RE, which contrasts to findings in rectal cancer. Notably, this study took anal swabs from the tumor site, which is different from the faecal specimens used in other studies. Given the unique biological feature of HPV-driven anal squamous carcinoma, and the limited sequencing volume from anal swabs, as well as only 12 cases for RE analysis and 16 cases for anal dermatitis analysis, findings in this study merit further confirmation.

Collectively, some microbial features have been consistently identified in both animal models and clinical cohorts to be associated with amelioration of radiation injury, including lactate-producers [16, 25, 35, 36], SCFA-producers [16, 25, 29,30,31, 34,35,36] and Akkermansia [23, 36] (Fig. 1), as well as high α diversity [17, 20, 36] especially SDI [28, 30, 31, 33]. Nonetheless, disagreements also exist on the differential distribution of some microorganisms in different symptom groups, which will be discussed in the next section. Regarding the discrepancy on the statistical significance for α diversity, we deduce that limited sample size, as well as differences in specimen sources, study populations (varied race, gender, cancer types, etc.), methods for toxicity assessment and group stratifications may account. Summary in Table 3 may provide clues for designing confirmative studies in the future. Despite use of baseline specimens to profile the pre-existing unaffected microbiota in most clinical studies, the temporal relationship is insufficient for inferences on causality. Hence, we should interpret a particular microorganism to be beneficial or deleterious cautiously, and unravelling the molecular mechanisms is crucial.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Microbiota features associated with radiation injury concordantly revealed in clinical and experimental studies. Left panel: Eubiosis associated with radio-protection phenotype in hosts, as featured by increased bacterial diversity and overrepresentation of beneficial microbes like SCFA-producers including Lachnospiraceae as well as Lactobacillus and Akkermansia which promote intestinal stem cell repairment by activating EGF and Wnt pathways. Dynamically, microbial diversity and Lachnospiraceae abundance is consistently reported to decline whereas Akkermansia abundance rises throughout radiotherapy. Right panel: Dysbiosis related with radiation injury vulnerability in hosts, as featured by enrichment of potentially harmful microbes including pro-diarrhea Escherichia, IgA-degrader Sutterella as well as pro-inflammatory Fusobacterium, whose abundances all correspondingly increase after radiotherapy. SDI Shannon diversity index. Created with

Table 3 Clinical studies deciphering the predictive value of the gut microbiota in radiation-induced toxicities

Mechanistic investigations on microbiota-host interactions in radiation injury

Most mechanistic explorations on microbiota-host interactions in radiation injury focus on intestinal impairment, probably due to the complicated pathogenesis and limited therapeutic options in RE compared to myelosuppression. According to contemporary concept, a series of events underlie RE pathophysiology: release of abundant reactive oxygen species, enterocyte death and repairment, mucosal barrier breach, inflammation and immunosuppression, angiogenesis and vascular sclerosis as well as progressive fibrosis [2], with prostaglandin and NF-κB signaling pathways participating in all of the stages [38]. Under this frame, we summarize the mechanistic evidence for microbiota in radiation injury. Given the pathophysiological similarities between RE and IBD [2], these investigations also hold translational merits for understanding IBD pathogenesis.

Biological functions inferred by integration with metabolomics

Unravelling the convergent biological functions behind the divergent microbial compositions may be more generalizable given the variability of microbiota profiles between individuals. In post-radiation murine plasma and urine, increased metabolism pathways include primary bile acid (BA) biosynthesis, taurine metabolism and lipid metabolism [39,40,41] whereas decreased metabolites include indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), 3-indoxylsulfate and indole lactate [39] which are transformed by the gut microbiota [41] from tryptophan, a type of aromatic amino acid. In irradiated murine feaces, abundances of primary BAs and taurine rise whilst abundance of secondary BAs decline with the elevated radiation dose, while aromatic amino acid metabolism and BA secretion pathways are co-activated [18]. The dramatic decline in murine faecal SCFAs [8, 42] (including acetate, propionate, butyrate and valerate) and IPA [43] after radiation which are reversed by faecal microbiota transplantation (MT) also support radio-protective attributes for these metabolites. Concordantly, in feaces from cervical cancer patients susceptible to acute RE, SCFAs demonstrate a significantly sharper decline while BAs increase after radiotherapy [44]. This finding aligns with Ferreira’s findings [34, 45] on prostate cancer that intestinal SCFA-producers and faecal butyrate level both decline more dramatically in patients with acute RE, and with Shi’s finding [35] on rectal cancer that BA biosynthesis pathway enriched in patients with milder diarrhea. Notably, butyrate alteration is not detected in plasma or urine specimens probably indicating a localized effect of this metabolite [45]. Regarding lipid metabolism, the predictive performance of the lipid-like metabolite ptilosteroid A for acute RE in gynecological cancer patients underscores its significance [33]. To summarize, post-radiation metabolomics from both rodent and human specimens consistently highlight the potential values of SCFAs and aromatic amino acid-derived indole compounds, as well as metabolism dysregulation in BAs and lipids in radiation injury.

SCFAs and indole compounds

Both SCFAs and indole compounds are produced from gut microbiota and regarded as free-radical scavengers. SCFAs are the preferred energy source to colonocytes and serve as histone deacetylation inhibitors and G-protein-coupled-receptor (GPR) ligands. By inactivating NF-κB pathway, SCFAs upregulate anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6, enhance anti-microbial functions of macrophages and regulate colonic Tregs homeostasis [46]. Whether these anti-inflammatory properties contribute to radio-protection requires investigations. Fan’s group proved that butyrate attenuates post-radiation intestinal injury and inflammation, reverses dysbiosis and enhances gut integrity by activating GPR41/43 pathway [8], and that both valerate [42] and IPA [43] impart hematopoietic and gastrointestinal radio-mitigation by restoring microbial homeostasis. Mechanistically, valerate re-elevates the post-radiation decline of KRT1, a component of cytoskeleton capable of sustaining epithelial integrity against stresses whereas IPA exerts radio-protection by re-activating the down-regulated pregnane X receptor/acyl-CoA-binding protein pathway to enhance gut integrity. In parallel, selective post-radiation enrichment of Lachnospiraceae and Enterococcaceae families renders corresponding mice the “survivor phenotype” represented as attenuated hematopoietic and intestinal impairment after TBI. Butyrate and propionate derived from Lachnospiraceae are partly responsible by reducing DNA damage and reactive oxygen species release, and tryptophan-derived indole compounds (kynurenic acid and indole-3-carboxaldehyde) are also proved to be radio-protective albeit lacking mechanistic explanations in this study [47]. Reportedly, indole compounds as ligands to aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated transcriptional activity enhance proliferation of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) [48] and promote anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory immune responses [49, 50]. One example is 3,3′-diindolylmethane which is hydrolyzed by gastric acid from indole-3-carbinol, imposes radio-protection by promoting post-radiation DNA damage repair, ISCs survival and anti-oxidative reactions as well as reversing radiation-induced gut dysbiosis [11].

Metabolism dysregulation in BAs and lipids

BAs participate into absorption and metabolism of dietary lipids and cholesterols, and affect the detoxification of xenobiotics and the regulation of intestinal inflammation as well. Exposure of enterocytes to primary BAs aggravates inflammation in IBD whereas secondary BAs possess potent anti-inflammatory capacities [51]. The increase in primary BAs is generally attributed to post-radiation malabsorption and gut dysbiosis [18]. What deserves attention is that the beneficial Lactobacillus and Ruminococcaceae both participate into production of secondary BAs, whose post-radiation decline may therefore aggravate enteritis [18, 25]. Nonetheless, there is still a lack of direct evidence on how BA metabolism dysregulation induced by dysbiosis affects radiation injury.

Regarding the role of microbiota-regulated lipid metabolism in radiation injury, the elevated energy demand during post-radiation repairment phase may be a breakthrough although supportive evidence is lacking. Fasting-induced adipose factor (Fiaf) is an important lipid metabolism regulator secreted from epithelium which stimulates fat mobilization, triglycerides deposition, endothelial survival and vascular sprouting. According to Crawford and Gordon [4], the existence of gut microbiota suppresses the expression of Fiaf, which then increases apoptosis of endothelial cells and lymphocytes in the intestinal villi after TBI thereby aggravating enteritis and shortening post-radiation mice survival. However, no subsequent research unravels the molecular mechanism for Fiaf’s radio-protection. Another assumption is that undesirable microorganisms may radio-sensitize normal tissues by exacerbating lipid peroxidation, which is a major target for oxidative stress and radiation injury. For example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen commonly habituating in hospitalized immunocompromised patients, induces ferroptosis, augments post-radiation gut barrier breach and ensuing lethality through producing 15-lipoxygenase. 15-lipoxygenase also promotes a transition to pro-inflammatory milieu by modulating inflammation-related lipid signaling, immunocyte recruitment and cytokine production in small intestine [52].

Lactobacillus spp.

Experimental evidence suggests that pre-treatment with Lactobacillus mitigates radiation injury by improving gut dysbiosis, intestinal histopathology and by inhibiting endotoxemia occurrence and bacterial translocation [20, 53]. Radio-protective mechanisms concordantly highlight regulations of Lactobacillus on ISCs, which are radio-resistant and important for post-radiation gut repairment. In this process, mesenchymal cells play indispensable mediating roles by sensing microbial signals and activating downstream pathways [53,54,55,56]. According to Ciorba’s study [53, 54], gut Lactobacillus releases lipoteichoic acid to activate the Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2)/MyD88 pathway in intestinal peri-cryptal macrophages, thereby promoting the mesenchymal stem cells to migrate from villi to crypts where ISCs located, in a CXCL12-CXCR4 chemotactic manner. Lipoteichoic acid also activates TLR-2 on the migrated mesenchymal stem cells to promote the production of cyclooxygenase-2 and the ensuing synthesis of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Locally secreted PGE2 then binds E prostaglandin recepter-2 on ISCs to execute anti-apoptotic and pro-proliferative functions by activating epidermal growth factor(EGF)-Akt-Bax signaling [57]. Notably, PGE2 is also radio-protective of hematopoietic stem cells via activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway and of cancer cells via activating EGF-ERK2-MAPK pathway [57]. In this study, however, Lactobacillus renders no radio-protection on hematopoietic stem cells and even delays the growth of subcutaneously implanted colon cancer cells [54]. A possible explanation is that Lactobacillus functions by producing PGE2, which is unstable and only acts over a short distance. And hematopoietic and cancer cells are spared from exposure to PGE2 in gavage studies with Lactobacillus. In another study [55], Lactobacillus-derived lactate interacts with GPR81 expressed on Paneth cells and mesenchymal cells thereby increasing the secretion of Wnt3 and Wnt2b. Supply of these Wnt ligands effectively promotes β-catenin nuclear translocation in ISCs [56] and consequently improves the epithelial regeneration capacity and mice survival after exposed to radiation plus methotrexate.

However, Bifidobacterium also producing lipoteichoic acid and lactate did not exhibit radio-protection when administered alone according to Ciorba’s study [53], suggesting that there may exist other mechanisms as replenishment. Reportedly, Lactobacillus ameliorates inflammation via downstream protein p40 to promote immunoglobulin A (IgA) secretion against pathogenic infections, to reduce inflammatory cell infiltration, cytokine secretion and cytokine-induced apoptosis by activating EGF-PI3K-Akt signaling [58, 59]; and triggers anti-oxidant responses [60] by producing superoxide dismutases [61] and PGE2 [62]. Whether and how such anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties contribute to radio-protection should be elucidated in future research.

Akkermansia muciniphila

Akkermansia muciniphila residing in the mucus layer participates into the production and degradation of mucus, with SCFA as the end products. As a next-generation probiotic candidate it alleviates inflammatory disorders and metabolic syndromes and improves therapeutic responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors [63, 64]. Yet in radiation injury, the specific role of Akkermansia seems paradoxical at the first sight [23,24,25]. On the one hand, Epperly et al. reported that oral gavage of Akkermansia strikingly increases murine 30-day-survival rate from 0 to 100% following TBI [23]. Kim et al. [63] further demonstrated that Akkermansia effectively upregulates ISCs proliferation and differentiation towards secretory cells, leading to increased goblet cells and thickened mucus layer. Like lactate [55], pre-treatment with Akkermansia ameliorates intestinal injury in mice and organoids exposed to radiation plus methotrexate. Mechanistically, supplement of Akkermansia dramatically alters murine intestinal microbial composition and increases SDI, which in turn enhances the production of SCFAs. Of these, acetate and propionate effectively promote epithelial proliferation by increasing the Wnt ligands secretion from Paneth cells to activate the β-catenin-RAS-ERK signaling in ISCs. On the other hand, the expansion of Akkermansia is consistently observed in both radiated and colitis models [20, 23, 24], supporting this microbe in association with inflammation. Notably, Gerassy et al. [17] proved that radiation induces a proinflammatory dysbiosis featured by expansion of microbes including Akkermansia. Such dysbiosis is transmissible via faecal MT and enhances host secretion of IL-1β, a responsive mediator to radiation and colitis stimuli which deteriorates intestinal injury. Combining these findings, we deduce that the rise in Akkermansia may represent a repairment response towards the activation of inflammatory regulation, and a compensatory protection towards the shortage of SCFA-producers after radiation stimuli, rather than a deleterious factor in spite of its reported negative prognostic value in mice [25] and minipigs [21]. Given the extensive evidence in other disorders for this microbe improves prognosis by enhancing mucosal barrier and suppressing local inflammation, its role in radiation injury merits in-depth investigations.

Cross-connections and comments for other microbes

Notably, the post-radiation decreasing trend of the order Clostridiales (including the family Clostridiaceae and the genus Clostridium) is concordantly reported in radiated mice [17,18,19, 43] and radiated patients [31, 37]. Consistent results that Clostridia [35] and Clostridiales [29,30,31, 47] are significantly enriched in hosts with milder post-radiation toxicities also lend strong support to this radio-sensitive microbial cluster as radio-protective, albeit with contradictory finding in one small-sample-size study investigating microbiome sampled from tumor site [37]. In literature, class Clostridia is perceived as beneficial by engaging into the degradation of taurine, which is a sulfur-containing amino acid involved in BA conjugation and possesses anti-oxidation and de-toxication properties [18], and Clostridium sporogenes is the only identified IPA-producing microbe. More importantly, bacteria in class Clostridia are commonly equipped with butyrate production capacity and thus involved into immunomodulation by promoting expansion of intraepithelial lymphocytes, IgA-producing cells and colonic Tregs [65]. However, Clostridiales is composed of mixed species including pathogens like Clostridium perfrigens as well. The specific radio-protective member(s) in Clostridiales and underlying mechanisms requires systemic investigations.

Of interest, Coprococcus belonging to the family Lachnospiraceae and the order Clostridiales, is significantly underrepresented at baseline in both gynecological and rectal cancer patients predisposing to acute post-radiation toxicities [30, 36], supporting this SCFA-producer being radio-protective. In prostate cancer, however, SCFA-producers were found to be overrepresented in both acute and chronic symptomatic patients throughout the treatment [32, 34]. Regarding the paradoxical finding, two interesting explanations proposed by Ferriera et al. merit validation: (1) the overrepresentation of SCFA-producers in feaces results from excessive microbe shedding secondary to the increased competition with pathogens, which is more common in patients vulnerable to radiation injury; (2) patients with pre-existing subclinical intestinal dysfunctions possess a compromised microbiota and may therefore have higher dependence on SCFA supply which is represented by the overrepresentation of SCFA-producers in their feaces, and this group may be predisposed to severe RE.

Another microorganism deserving attention is Sutterella, belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria, overrepresented in patients predisposing to acute RE following cervical or prostate radiotherapy [31, 34]. In rodent models, Sutterella is significantly enriched following rectum radiation and also positively correlated with colonic injury [17]. However, Sutterella abundance correlated inversely with occurrence of chronic RE in a mixed clinical cohort [34]. Reportedly, Sutterella degrades secretory IgA [66] which acts as an important local immunoregulator restricting pathogenic infections especially intracellular pathobionts like Fusobacterium. The Sutterella expansion and ensuing IgA low phenotype increases host’s susceptibility to colitis stimuli [66] and resistance to ulcerative colitis treatment [67], hence may account for the aggravation of acute RE. On the other hand, Sutterella possesses almost negligible capacity of promoting inflammatory cytokines production in IBD [67] which may explain its nonharmful role in the non-inflammatory pathogenesis of chronic RE although more investigations are needed to illustrate how this microbe influences radiation injury development.

Overall, evidence supports that the gut microbiota has magnificent impacts on radiation injury via: (a) regulating cytotoxicity and repairment, and therefore sustaining epithelial and mucus barrier to defend bacterial translocation; (b) modulating host inflammation and immune functions; (c) controlling post-radiation oxidative stresses. These functional pathways are not mutually exclusive and rather occur complementally, and we briefly summarize the mechanisms in Fig. 2 and Table 4.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Microbe-host interactions in radiation injury attenuation and augmentation. Microbes impact radiation injury development by regulating cytotoxicity and repairment in crypt-villous units: 1 Undefined microbes suppress the secretion of Fiaf from epithelium, thereby aggravating enteritis by increasing apoptosis of lymphocytes and endothelial cells in villus mesenchyme. 2 Probiotics-derived lactate interacts with Gpr81 on Paneth cells and stromal cells to stimulate secretion of Wnt3 and Wnt2b, which prompt epithelial replenishment by activating β-catenin pathway in intestinal stem cells. 3 Lactobacillus-derived lipoteichoic acid activates TLR-2/MYD88 on macrophages to induce secretion of chemotactic CXCL12 which binds CXCR4 to mediate the migration of mesenchymal stem cells to where intestinal stem cells locate, so as to boost enterocyte regeneration through the PGE2-EP2-EGF-Akt-Bax pathway. 4 Akkermansia-derived acetate and propionate bind Gpr41/43 to up-regulate the Wnt3/β-catenin-RAS-ERK pathway in intestinal stem cells, so as to promote their renewal and differentiation into secretory cells demonstrated as the thickened mucus layer. B SCFAs and indole compounds produced by representative microorganisms impose radio-protection through regulating inflammation and immune reseponse: 5 SCFAs promote anti-inflammation response and decrease barrier permeability by decreasing DNA damage and cell loss as well as by increasing expression of proteins related with gut integrity maintainment. 6 IPA reactivates the post-radiation declined PXR/ACBP pathway to control inflammation and improve gut integrity. C Microbiota-regulated oxidative stress augments radiation injury: Psedumonas aeruginosa-derived 15-lipoxygenase increases lipid peroxidation, induces ferroptosis and exacerbates inflammation by promoting immunocyte recruitment and elevating proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines and lipid mediators. Pro-inflammatory molecules: LCN2, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, IL-2, LTB4, HxA3; anti-inflammatory markers: IL-10, IL-4, TGF-β. Fiaf fasting-induced adipose factor, Gpr G-protein-coupled receptor; TLR-2 Toll-like-receptor-2, PGE2 prostaglandin E2, EP2 E prostaglandin recepter-2, EGF epidermal growth factor, SCFA short chain fatty acid, IPA indole-3-propionic acid, I3A indole-3-carboxaldehyde, ROS = reactive oxygen species, LCN2 lipocalin, KRT1 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 1, PXR pregnane X receptor, ACBP acyl-CoA binding protein, LTB4 leukotriene B4, HxA3 hepoxilin A3. Created with

Table 4 Regulatory mechanisms of keystone microorganisms and derived metabolites in radiation injury

Microbiota manipulation strategies in radiation injury

Faecal and oral MT

Faecal MT is established as an effective preventive option for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection [68] and the first product Rebyota [69] has recently been approved by FDA. However, severe complications including deaths used to be reported and data from long-term follow-up is scarce. Protocol standardization is still under cautious investigations and freshly purified materials combining multiple delivery routes are recommended for the sake of efficacy and safety [68]. In radiation injury, two research groups from China reported the feasibility of washed faecal MT in treating chronic RE, which is proven to be safer, more precise and quality-controllable than traditional crude faecal MT [70]. In Ding’s report [71], five cases aged from 45 to 81 with persistent Grade 2–4 chronic RE symptoms (per RTOG criteria) after gynecological cancer radiotherapy had at least one course of single-donor MT through the naso-jejunal transendoscopic enteral tubing. Three cases achieved the primary endpoint of ≥ one-grade reduction in toxicity at eight-week follow-up, with only one adverse event of transient nausea. However, the three cases all relapsed at longer follow-up, indicating short-lasting efficacy of this approach. In this context, strategic modifications merit consideration: (a) commencing MT earlier, which requires in advance prediction of chronic RE since this disorder is progressive; (b) repeating the courses to consolidate colonization; (c) optimizing sources of donor based on knowledge of beneficial microbiota compositions. Supportive evidence comes from Zheng’s study [72] where one 45-year-old case with continuous blood loss due to Grade 2 chronic RE (per RTOG criteria) after cervical cancer radiotherapy underwent multi-donor MT via lower-gut delivery as the first course and mid-gut delivery as the remaining three courses. At six-month follow-up, the patient’s symptoms relieved without any adverse events. This case report demonstrates that repeated transplantations of a more diverse microbiota effectively and safely mitigate hemorrhagic chronic RE, which deserves confirmation in larger cohorts with longer follow-up.

Of interest, oral microbiota is also correlated with aggravation of post-radiation oropharyngeal mucositis in nasopharyngeal cancer [73, 74], and one Chinese group successfully conducted oral MT from healthy mice to radiated mice to alleviate oral mucositis [75]. However, oral MT in colitis colorectal cancer model impaired radiotherapy efficacy and aggravated gastrointestinal toxicity, which was attributed to Fusobacterium, a pathogenic commensal in oral cavity [76]. Therefore, clarification of ideal consortia for mitigating toxicity is a prerequisite for application of MT in radio-protection and radio-mitigation.

Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics

Probiotics containing identified live organisms may be preferrable to a mixture of uncertain components in feaces material. Lactate-producing probiotics as anti-diarrhea preventive strategy in radiotherapy patients is recommended in guidelines [77], nonetheless the low quality and heterogeneity of the analyzed clinical trials hamper its widespread application. Reports regarding influences of these probiotics on myelosuppression are scarce and debated [78, 79]. Also due to incomplete data, toxicity profile of probiotics has not been clearly summarized either. Potential risks in vulnerable population like immunocompromised cancer patients include systemic infections, deleterious metabolism, overactivated immunoregulation and gene transfer with hosts [80]. In our literature review, adverse events of probiotics use in radiotherapy patients include neutropenic infection [39], fever [78] and gastrointestinal discomforts [30] but transient and with a low incidence. Complementally, prebiotics and synbiotics also represent as viable options by fostering growth of desired microorganisms. Prebiotics containing inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide, which favor lactate-producers growth, shorten duration with watery stools but confer no significant improvements in radiation-induced symptoms in gynecological cancer patients [81]. However, synbiotics containing inulin, guar gum mixture and Lactobacillus reportedly attenuate acute radiation proctitis in prostate cancer patients [82]. These pilot randomized clinical trials warrant further investigations.

Up to now, some insightful implications have been accrued from probiotics practice: (a) mixture preparations outperform single-strain probiotic[83]; (b) Lactobacillus is preferred to Bifidobacterium [38, 53]; (c) prophylactic use outperforms salvage therapy [38]; (d) more prominent benefits in reducing severe diarrhea (Grade ≥ 2, per CTCAE) [84]. However, the unclear efficacy and safety require optimization of probiotics in dose, delivery and formulation. Massive mechanism-driven works also pinpoint additional radio-protective microbiota components other than Lactobacillus and lactate. We look forward to the development of next-generation probiotics which should be corroborated in well-designed high-quality clinical trials to change practice.

Functional constituents, selective agonists and antagonists

The un-predictable risk with live microorganisms prompts search for pure functional constituents from microbiota as alternatives. The soluble anti-inflammatory protein p40 purified from Lactobacillus by Yan’s group [59] represents an example, but it is still in the laboratory stage, as are most of the keystone metabolites discussed above. Moderate-quality evidence from one small-sample-size trial suggests that sodium butyrate enema probably cannot reduce acute gastrointestinal toxicities in men undergoing prostate radiotherapy [85], which requires further investigations. Of note, lactate, SCFAs and indole compounds all possess anti-oxidant capacities. Future investigations on these metabolites will have to focus on side effects, therapeutic time window and impacts on tumor control since they constitute the major obstacles for application of anti-oxidants in radio-protection, like the case with amifostine [2].

Mechanistic exploration on microbe-host interactive pathways paves way for developing selective agonists or antagonists for radio-protection. One attractive target is TLR signaling with downstream effector PGE2. The TLR-4 ligand lipopolysaccharide produced by gram negative microbes [86], TLR-5 ligand derived from Salmonella flagellin [87, 88] and TLR-2 ligands like lipoteichoic acid from gram positive microbes [53, 54] as well as lipopeptide from Mycoplasma are outlooking radioprotectors [89]. Especially the engineered de-toxic derivative of Salmonella flagellin, Entolimod (CBLB502) is now under investigation with FDA [90]. Inhibitors of inflammatory cytokines and lipid mediators as well as microbial enzymes also promise to be tailored radio-protective strategies, including the FDA-approved IL-1β antagonist anakinra which can be administered in gut dysbiotic patients [17], and 15-lipoxygenase inhibitor baicalein which can be prescribed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected patients [52].

Taken together, we are still at a very early stage on translating the knowledge of microbiota interacting with radiation injury into effective countermeasures. Procedure standardization and safety monitor for microbiota manipulation strategies require in-depth investigations. Both prophylactic use of probiotics and TLR agonists outperform post-radiation salvage [53, 87, 88], again highlighting the importance of prediction to tailor the radio-protective strategy according to radiation injury risk.


Radiation injury is a highly complex and overlooked disorder requiring multidiscipline expertise. Symptomatic countermeasures are limitedly available at present for acute RE and myelosuppression. Physicians generally hold dismissal attitudes to chronic RE and patients tend to tolerate gastrointestinal dysfunctions lifelong. In this review, we summarized a large body of evidence for harnessing the gut microbiota to solve this challenging issue from perspectives of prediction, prevention and mitigation. Preclinical and clinical data consistently indicate some microbial signatures to be associated with both RE and myelosuppression, including lactate-producers, SCFA-producers, indole compound-producers, IgA-degraders, β-glucuronidase-producers and Akkermansia, etc. which not only form the basis of prediction but also provide targets for manipulation. Aside from the promising index of SDI which potentially serves as an independent toxicity predictor in multiple types of cancer, we are happy to see some inspiring pilot prediction models established using keystone microbial features. Validations of SDI and these models in carefully designed studies with larger populations are necessary. Selective MT, probiotics, purified functional metabolites and vital pathway ligands have been proposed for radio-protection and radio-mitigation, and accumulated some evidence in clinical trials. However, few of them have successfully advanced to clinical application due to nonoptimal efficacy, undesired complications and unclarified potential tumor protection. Therefore, much work remains to be done in identifying ideal radio-protective microbial consortia and optimizing microbiota manipulation strategies. To fulfill this goal, we look forward to more multi-omics data, more solid causality evidence and clarified mechanisms in the future to facilitate the customization of optimal therapeutic strategies for cancer patients undertaking radiotherapy.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Radiation enteropathy


Inflammatory bowel disease


Food and drug administration


Total body radiation


Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor


Shannon diversity index


The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve


Short chain fatty acid


Bile acid


Indole-3-propionic acid


Microbiota transplantation




Intestinal stem cells


Fasting-induced adipose factor


Toll-like receptor


Prostaglandin E2


Epidermal growth factor


Immunoglobulin A


Radiation therapy oncology group scale


Common terminology criteria for adverse events


  1. Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022;12(1):31–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hauer-Jensen M, Denham JW, Andreyev HJ. Radiation enteropathy–pathogenesis, treatment and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):470–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreyev J. Gastrointestinal complications of pelvic radiotherapy: are they of any importance? Gut. 2005;54(8):1051–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford PA, Gordon JI. Microbial regulation of intestinal radiosensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102(37):13254–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cui M, Xiao H, Li Y, Zhou L, Zhao S, Luo D, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation protects against radiation-induced toxicity. EMBO Mol Med. 2017;9(4):448–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Qadami G, Verma G, Van Sebille Y, Le H, Hewson I, Bateman E, et al. Antibiotic-induced gut microbiota depletion accelerates the recovery of radiation-induced oral mucositis in rats. Int J Radiat Oncol BiolPhys. 2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui M, Xiao H, Luo D, Zhang X, Zhao S, Zheng Q, et al. Circadian rhythm shapes the gut microbiota affecting host radiosensitivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(11):1786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Y, Xiao H, Dong J, Luo D, Wang H, Zhang S, et al. Gut microbiota metabolite fights against dietary polysorbate 80-aggravated radiation enteritis. Front Microbial. 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui M, Xiao H, Li Y, Zhang S, Dong J, Wang B, et al. Sexual dimorphism of gut microbiota dictates therapeutics efficacy of radiation injuries. Adv Sci. 2019;6(21):1901048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Dong J, Xiao H, Wang B, Chen Z, Zhang S, et al. Caloric restriction alleviates radiation injuries in a sex-dependent fashion. FASEB J. 2021;35(8):e21787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu L, Jiang M, Zhu C, He J, Fan S. Amelioration of whole abdominal irradiation-induced intestinal injury in mice with 3, 3′-diindolylmethane (DIM). Free Radical Biol Med. 2019;130:244–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li M, Gu M-M, Lang Y, Shi J, Chen BP, Guan H, et al. The vanillin derivative VND3207 protects intestine against radiation injury by modulating p53/NOXA signaling pathway and restoring the balance of gut microbiota. Free Radical Biol Med. 2019;145:223–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao H-w, Li Y, Luo D, Dong J-l, Zhou L-x, Zhao S-y, et al. Hydrogen-water ameliorates radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity via MyD88’s effects on the gut microbiota. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(1):e433-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Z, Wang B, Dong J, Li Y, Zhang S, Zeng X, et al. Gut microbiota-derived l-Histidine/imidazole propionate Axis fights against the radiation-induced cardiopulmonary injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Özdemir BC, Csajka C, Dotto G-P, Wagner AD. Sex differences in efficacy and toxicity of systemic treatments: an undervalued issue in the era of precision oncology. J Clin Oncol Off J A Soci Clini Oncol. 2018;36(26):2680–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Onoue M, Uchida K, Yokokura T, Takahashi T, Mutai M. Effect of intestinal microflora on the survival time of mice exposed to lethal whole-body γ irradiation. Radiat Res. 1981;88(3):533–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerassy-Vainberg S, Blatt A, Danin-Poleg Y, Gershovich K, Sabo E, Nevelsky A, et al. Radiation induces proinflammatory dysbiosis: transmission of inflammatory susceptibility by host cytokine induction. Gut. 2018;67(1):97–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goudarzi M, Mak TD, Jacobs JP, Moon B-H, Strawn SJ, Braun J, et al. An integrated multi-omic approach to assess radiation injury on the host-microbiome axis. Radiat Res. 2016;186(3):219–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lam V, Moulder JE, Salzman NH, Dubinsky EA, Andersen GL, Baker JE. Intestinal microbiota as novel biomarkers of prior radiation exposure. Radiat Res. 2012;177(5):573–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao T-S, Xie L-W, Cai S, Xu J-Y, Zhou H, Tang L-F, et al. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota is associated with the progression of radiation-induced intestinal injury and is alleviated by oral compound probiotics in mouse model. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Carbonero F, Mayta A, Bolea M, Yu J-Z, Lindeblad M, Lyubimov A, et al. specific members of the gut microbiota are reliable biomarkers of irradiation intensity and lethality in large animal models of human health. Radiat Res. 2018;191(1):107–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tian Y, Zhang J, Huang Q. The preliminary application of faeces microbiome as biodosimeters of intestinal acute radiation injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(3): e175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tian J, Rodgers M, Epperly M, Ferik B, Novak E, Mollen K, et al. The gut microbe Akkermansia muciniphilia increases after radiation injury and can be supplemented by gavage to improve survival in radiated mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105(1):S223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Epperly M, Yu J, van Pijkeren J, Methe B, Li K, Fisher R, et al. Specific taxa of the intestinal microbiome mitigate the radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;108(3):S92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li K, Epperly MW, Barreto GA, Greenberger JS, Methé BA. Longitudinal fecal microbiome study of total body irradiated mice treated with radiation mitigators identifies bacterial associations with survival. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmed M, Ahmed R. Radiation in gastroenterology. Gastroenterology Res. 2022;15(6):285–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mauch P, Constine L, Greenberger J, Knospe W, Sullivan J, Liesveld JL, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat OncolBiol Phys. 1995;31(5):1319–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang A, Ling Z, Yang Z, Kiela PR, Wang T, Wang C, et al. Gut microbial dysbiosis may predict diarrhea and fatigue in patients undergoing pelvic cancer radiotherapy: a pilot study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5): e0126312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Manichanh C, Varela E, Martinez C, Antolin M, Llopis M, Doré J, et al. The gut microbiota predispose to the pathophysiology of acute postradiotherapy diarrhea. Off J A Coll Gastroenterol ACG. 2008;103(7):1754–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Z, Wang Q, Wang X, Zhu L, Chen J, Zhang B, et al. Gut microbial dysbiosis is associated with development and progression of radiation enteritis during pelvic radiotherapy. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(5):3747–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitra A, Grossman Biegert GW, Delgado AY, Karpinets TV, Solley TN, Mezzari MP, et al. Microbial diversity and composition is associated with patient-reported toxicity during chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107(1):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lynn E, El Alam M, Karpinets T, Lin D, Kouzy R, Court K, et al. Association of Gut Microbiome Characteristics With the Late Gastrointestinal Toxicities After Pelvic Receiving Radiation Treatment for Cervical, Vaginal, and Anal Cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;111(3):e628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cai S, Yang Y, Kong Y, Guo Q, Xu Y, Xing P, et al. Gut bacteria Erysipelatoclostridium and its related metabolite ptilosteroid A could predict radiation-induced intestinal injury. Front Public Health. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Reis Ferreira M, Andreyev H, Mohammed K, Truelove L, Gowan SM, Li J, et al. Microbiota-and Radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal side-effects (MARS) study: a large pilot study of the microbiome in acute and late-radiation enteropathymicrobiota-and radiotherapy-induced gi side-effects (MARS). Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(21):6487–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shi W, Shen L, Zou W, Wang J, Yang J, Wang Y, et al. The gut microbiome is associated with therapeutic responses and toxicities of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients-a pilot study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10: 562463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Yi Y, Shen L, Xia F, Wang Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, et al. The gut microbiome profile predicts the severe acute toxicities in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;111(3):S103–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin D, El Alam MB, Abi Jaoude J, Kouzy R, Phan JL, Elnaggar JH, et al. Microbiome dynamics during chemoradiation therapy for anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ciorba MA, Hallemeier CL, Stenson WF, Parikh PJ. Probiotics to prevent gastrointestinal toxicity from cancer therapy: an interpretive review and call to action. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2015;9(2):157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Broin PÓ, Vaitheesvaran B, Saha S, Hartil K, Chen EI, Goldman D, et al. Intestinal microbiota-derived metabolomic blood plasma markers for prior radiation injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(2):360–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Khan AR, Rana P, Devi MM, Chaturvedi S, Javed S, Tripathi RP, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-based metabonomic investigation of biochemical effects in serum of γ-irradiated mice. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011;87(1):91–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J, Schultz PG, Lesley SA, Peters EC, et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(10):3698–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Li Y, Dong J, Xiao H, Zhang S, Wang B, Cui M, et al. Gut commensal derived-valeric acid protects against radiation injuries. Gut microbes. 2020;11(4):789–806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Xiao H-w, Cui M, Li Y, Dong J-l, Zhang S-q, Zhu C-c, et al. Gut microbiota-derived indole 3-propionic acid protects against radiation toxicity via retaining acyl-CoA-binding protein. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chai Y, Wang J, Wang T, Yang Y, Su J, Shi F, et al. Application of 1H NMR spectroscopy-based metabonomics to feces of cervical cancer patients with radiation-induced acute intestinal symptoms. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117(2):294–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ferreira MR, Sands CJ, Li JV, Andreyev JN, Chekmeneva E, Gulliford S, et al. Impact of pelvic radiation therapy for prostate cancer on global metabolic profiles and microbiota-driven gastrointestinal late side effects: a longitudinal observational study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;111(5):1204–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Janney A, Powrie F, Mann EH. Host–microbiota maladaptation in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2020;585(7826):509–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Guo H, Chou W-C, Lai Y, Liang K, Tam JW, Brickey WJ, et al. Multi-omics analyses of radiation survivors identify radioprotective microbes and metabolites. Science. 2020;370(6516):eaay9097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Metidji A, Omenetti S, Crotta S, Li Y, Nye E, Ross E, et al. The environmental sensor AHR protects from inflammatory damage by maintaining intestinal stem cell homeostasis and barrier integrity. Immunity. 2018;49(2):353–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Alexeev EE, Lanis JM, Kao DJ, Campbell EL, Kelly CJ, Battista KD, et al. Microbiota-derived indole metabolites promote human and murine intestinal homeostasis through regulation of interleukin-10 receptor. Am J Pathol. 2018;188(5):1183–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Wlodarska M, Luo C, Kolde R, d’Hennezel E, Annand JW, Heim CE, et al. Indoleacrylic acid produced by commensal peptostreptococcus species suppresses inflammation. Cell Host microbe. 2017;22(1):25–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Duboc H, Rajca S, Rainteau D, Benarous D, Maubert M-A, Quervain E, et al. Connecting dysbiosis, bile-acid dysmetabolism and gut inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut. 2013;62(4):531–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dar HH, Epperly MW, Tyurin VA, Amoscato AA, Anthonymuthu TS, Souryavong AB, et al. P. aeruginosa augments irradiation injury via 15-lipoxygenase–catalyzed generation of 15-HpETE-PE and induction of theft-ferroptosis. JCI Insight. 2022;7(4):e156013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ciorba MA, Riehl TE, Rao MS, Moon C, Ee X, Nava GM, et al. Lactobacillus probiotic protects intestinal epithelium from radiation injury in a TLR-2/cyclo-oxygenase-2-dependent manner. Gut. 2012;61(6):829–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Riehl TE, Alvarado D, Ee X, Zuckerman A, Foster L, Kapoor V, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protects the intestinal epithelium from radiation injury through release of lipoteichoic acid, macrophage activation and the migration of mesenchymal stem cells. Gut. 2019;68(6):1003–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee Y-S, Kim T-Y, Kim Y, Lee S-H, Kim S, Kang SW, et al. Microbiota-derived lactate accelerates intestinal stem-cell-mediated epithelial development. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24(6):833–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gehart H, Clevers H. Tales from the crypt: new insights into intestinal stem cells. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(1):19–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Stenson WF, Ciorba MA. Nonmicrobial activation of TLRs controls intestinal growth, wound repair, and radioprotection. Front Immunol. 2021;11: 617510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang Y, Liu L, Moore DJ, Shen X, Peek RM, Acra SA, et al. An LGG-derived protein promotes IgA production through upregulation of APRIL expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10(2):373–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yan F, Cao H, Cover TL, Washington MK, Shi Y, Liu L, et al. Colon-specific delivery of a probiotic-derived soluble protein ameliorates intestinal inflammation in mice through an EGFR-dependent mechanism. J Clin Investig. 2011;121(6):2242–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Jones RM, Desai C, Darby TM, Luo L, Wolfarth AA, Scharer CD, et al. Lactobacilli modulate epithelial cytoprotection through the Nrf2 pathway. Cell Rep. 2015;12(8):1217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Han W, Mercenier A, Ait-Belgnaoui A, Pavan S, Lamine F, van Swam II, et al. Improvement of an experimental colitis in rats by lactic acid bacteria producing superoxide dismutase. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12(11):1044–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Patterson AM, Liu L, Sampson CH, Plett PA, Li H, Singh P, et al. A single radioprotective dose of prostaglandin E2 blocks irradiation-induced apoptotic signaling and early cycling of hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2020;15(2):358–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim S, Shin Y-C, Kim T-Y, Kim Y, Lee Y-S, Lee S-H, et al. Mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila accelerates intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial development. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1892441.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CPM, Alou MT, Daillère R, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359(6371):91–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F, Petito V, Gasbarrini A. Commensal Clostridia: leading players in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Gut Pathogens. 2013;5(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Moon C, Baldridge MT, Wallace MA, Burnham C-AD, Virgin HW, Stappenbeck TS. Vertically transmitted faecal IgA levels determine extra-chromosomal phenotypic variation. Nature. 2015;521(7550):90–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kaakoush NO. Sutterella species, IgA-degrading bacteria in ulcerative colitis. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(7):519–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang F, Cui B, He X, Nie Y, Wu K, Fan D. Microbiota transplantation: concept, methodology and strategy for its modernization. Protein Cell. 2018;9(5):462–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Khanna S, Assi M, Lee C, Yoho D, Louie T, Knapple W, et al. Efficacy and safety of RBX2660 in PUNCH CD3, a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a Bayesian primary analysis for the prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Drugs. 2022;82(15):1527–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang T, Lu G, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Shen Q, Li P, et al. Washed microbiota transplantation vs manual fecal microbiota transplantation: clinical findings, animal studies and in vitro screening. Protein Cell. 2020;11(4):251–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Ding X, Li Q, Li P, Chen X, Xiang L, Bi L, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation: a promising treatment for radiation enteritis? Radiother Oncol. 2020;143:12–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zheng Y-M, He X-X, Xia HH-X, Yuan Y, Xie W-R, Cai J-Y, et al. Multi-donor multi-course faecal microbiota transplantation relieves the symptoms of chronic hemorrhagic radiation proctitis: a case report. Medicine. 2020;99(39):e22298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Hou J, Zheng H, Li P, Liu H, Zhou H, Yang X. Distinct shifts in the oral microbiota are associated with the progression and aggravation of mucositis during radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129(1):44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhu X-X, Yang X-J, Chao Y-L, Zheng H-M, Sheng H-F, Liu H-Y, et al. The potential effect of oral microbiota in the prediction of mucositis during radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. EBioMedicine. 2017;18:23–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Xiao H, Fan Y, Li Y, Dong J, Zhang S, Wang B, et al. Oral microbiota transplantation fights against head and neck radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in mice. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:5898–910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Dong J, Li Y, Xiao H, Zhang S, Wang B, Wang H, et al. Oral microbiota affects the efficacy and prognosis of radiotherapy for colorectal cancer in mouse models. Cell Rep. 2021;37(4): 109886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Elad S, Cheng KKF, Lalla RV, Yarom N, Hong C, Logan RM, et al. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. 2020;126(19):4423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Okawa T, Niibe H, Arai T, Sekiba K, Noda K, Takeuchi S, et al. Effect of LC9018 combined with radiation therapy on carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Cancer. 1993;72(6):1949–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Osterlund P, Ruotsalainen T, Korpela R, Saxelin M, Ollus A, Valta P, et al. Lactobacillus supplementation for diarrhoea related to chemotherapy of colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(8):1028–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Banna GL, Torino F, Marletta F, Santagati M, Salemi R, Cannarozzo E, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: an overview to explore the rationale of its use in cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Garcia-Peris P, Velasco C, Hernandez M, Lozano M, Paron L, De La Cuerda C, et al. Effect of inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide on the prevention of acute radiation enteritis in patients with gynecological cancer and impact on quality-of-life: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(2):170–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Nascimento M, Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Caporossi C, Castro-Barcellos HM, Motta RT. Efficacy of synbiotics to reduce acute radiation proctitis symptoms and improve quality of life: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(2):289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Devaraj NK, Suppiah S, Veettil SK, Ching SM, Lee KW, Menon RK, et al. The effects of probiotic supplementation on the incidence of diarrhea in cancer patients receiving radiation therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2886.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Wang YH, Yao N, Wei KK, Jiang L, Hanif S, Wang ZX, et al. The efficacy and safety of probiotics for prevention of chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhea in people with abdominal and pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(11):1246–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lawrie TA, Green JT, Beresford M, Wedlake L, Burden S, Davidson SE, et al. Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1(1):cd012529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Riehl T, Cohn S, Tessner T, Schloemann S, Stenson WF. Lipopolysaccharide is radioprotective in the mouse intestine through a prostaglandin-mediated mechanism. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(6):1106–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Vijay-Kumar M, Aitken JD, Sanders CJ, Frias A, Sloane VM, Xu J, et al. Flagellin treatment protects against chemicals, bacteria, viruses, and radiation. J Immunol. 2008;180(12):8280–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Burdelya LG, Krivokrysenko VI, Tallant TC, Strom E, Gleiberman AS, Gupta D, et al. An agonist of toll-like receptor 5 has radioprotective activity in mouse and primate models. Science. 2008;320(5873):226–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Kamran MZ, Ranjan A, Kaur N, Sur S, Tandon V. Radioprotective agents: strategies and translational advances. Med Res Rev. 2016;36(3):461–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Singh VK, Seed TM. Entolimod as a radiation countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome. Drug Discovery Today. 2021;26(1):17–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. Kunyu Qiu for the critical and professional writing suggestions.


This study was supported by grants from Key Clinical Specialty Project of Shanghai, National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272732), Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Fund (21Y21900200), Shanghai Health Care Commission Fund (20214Y0146) and Fuxing Nursing Research Fund of Fudan University (FNF202016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ZZ, YW and LS concepted the idea, YY and WL researched data for the article and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lijun Shen, Yang Wu or Zhen Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors disclose no competing of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, Y., Lu, W., Shen, L. et al. The gut microbiota as a booster for radiotherapy: novel insights into radio-protection and radiation injury. Exp Hematol Oncol 12, 48 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Gut microbiota
  • Radio-protection
  • Lactobacillus
  • Akkermansia
  • Short chain fatty acid
  • Microbiota transplantation
  • Probiotic
  • Toll-like receptor