From: Molecular subclassification of gastrointestinal cancers based on cancer stem cell traits
Cancer types | Reference | Classifications | Signatures & Pathways (+: Activation, −: Suppression) | Prognosis | Inhibitors (+: Sensitive, −: Resistance) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liver cancer | Zhu et al. [30] | Notch-high | Notch and TGF-β signaling, KRT19, DCLK1, SOX9 (+) | higher tumor stage, worse survival outcome |  |
Liu et al. [31] | ES+, LP+ | ES+: pluripotency and stem cell self-renewal signaling pathways (+), Gli, Notch and Wnt pathways (+); LP+: TGF-β, Notch and Wnt pathways (+) |  | ES+: HLM6474 (+); LP+: SIS3 (+) | |
Lee et al. [32] | HB, HC | HB: KRT7, KRT19, VIM, AP-1 complex (+) | HB: tumor-invasive, worse survival, poorer prognosis | Â | |
Yamashita et al. [33] | HpSC-HCC (EpCAM+AFP+), MH-HCC (EpCAM−AFP−) | HpSC-HCC: KRT19, c-Myc, Wnt/β-catenin (+); MH-HCC: HepPar1 (+) | HpSC-HCC: tumor-invasive, poor prognosis MH-HCC: good prognosis | HpSC-HCC: β-catenin inhibitor (+); EpCAM+ HCC cells: GSK-3β inhibitor BIO, 5-FU (−); EpCAM− HCC cells: 5-FU (+) | |
Hoshida et al. [34] | S1, S2, S3 | S1: Wnt, TGF-β, EMT (+); S2: Myc, AKT, EpCAM, AFP (+); S3: hepatocyte differentiation (+) | S1: earlier recurrence, tumor-invasive, poor survival; S2: poor survival; S3: good survival |  | |
Boyault et al. [35] | G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6 | G1: AXINI mutations, fetal liver expressing genes, AFP (+); G2: AKT (+); G3: cell cycle genes (+); G5: Wnt (+); G6: Wnt, LEF1 (+), CDH1 (−) | G4-G6: better survival VS G1-G3 |  | |
Colorectal cancer | Marisa et al. [36] | C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6 | C1: EMT (−); C2: Wnt (−); C3: EMT (−); C4: EMT (+); C5: Wnt (+); C6: EMT (+) | C4 plus C6: worse prognosis VS all other subtypes |  |
Colorectal cancer | Sadanandam et al. [37] | Enterocyte, goblet-like, inflammatory, transit-amplifying (CS-TA, CR-TA), stem-like | Goblet-like and enterocyte: differentiation markers (+), stem cell and Wnt markers (−); Transit-amplifying: stem and progenitor markers (+), Wnt-target genes (−); Stem-like: Wnt, stem cell, myoepithelial and mesenchymal markers (+), differentiation markers (−) | Goblet-like and transit-amplifying: good prognosis; Enterocyte and inflammatory: intermediate DFS; Stem-like tumors: shortest DFS | Goblet-like: cetuximab (+); Inflammatory: FOLFIRI (+); Stem-like: cetuximab, FOLFIRI (+); CS-TA: cetuximab (+); CR-TA: cMET inhibitors (+), cetuximab (−) |
De Sousa et al. [38] | CCS1, CCS2, CCS3 | CCS1: Wnt (+); CCS3: EMT, matrix remodeling and TGF-β (+) | CCS3: poor prognosis | CCS3: cetuximab (−) | |
Budinska et al. [39] | Surface crypt-like, lower crypt-like, CIMP-H-like, mesenchymal, mixed | Surface crypt-like: EMT (−),Wnt (−), β-catenin (−); Lower crypt-like: EMT (−), Wnt (+); CIMP-H-like: β-catenin (−); Mesenchymal: EphB2, EMT (+), Wnt (−), β-catenin (−); Mixed: EphB2, EMT, Wnt (+) | Surface crypt-like and lower crypt-like: better prognosis VS mesenchymal; CIMP-H-like: poor OS and SAR; Mesenchymal: recurrence risk, poor OS; Mixed: poorer SAR VS lower crypt-like |  | |
Roepman et al. [40] | Type A, Type B, Type C | Type A: EMT (−); Type B: EMT (−); Type C: EMT (+) | Type A: good prognosis; Type B: poor prognosis; Type C: poor prognosis | Type A: 5-FU (+); Type B: 5-FU (+); Type C: 5-FU (-) | |
Guinney et al. [41] | CMS1, CMS2, CMS3, CMS4 | CMS1 and CMS3: RTK and MAPK pathways (+); CMS2: HNF4A, Myc and Wnt (+); CMS4: EMT, TGF-β, angiogenesis, matrix remodeling pathways (+) | CMS1: worse SAR; CMS4: worse RFS and OS | CMS1: HSP90 inhibitors (+); CMS2: HSP90 inhibitors, EGFR inhibitors, HER2 inhibitors (+); CMS4: combination treatment of 5-FU and luminespib (+) | |
Pancreatic cancer | Collisson et al. [43] | Classical, QM-PDA, exocrine-like | Classical: GATA6 (+); QM-PDA: mesenchyme associated genes (+) | Classical: good prognosis; Exocrine-like: intermediate prognosis; QM-PDA: worst prognosis | Classical: erlotinib (+), docetaxel (−); QM-PDA: oxaliplatine, 5-FU, BET inhibitor (+); Exocrine-like: SN-38 (−) |
Moffitt et al. [44] | Normal stromal, activated stroma, basal-like, classical | Activated stroma: SPARC, WNT2, WNT5A, MMP9, MMP11 (+); Classical: GATA6 (+); | Activated stroma: worse survival VS normal stroma; Basal-like: worse survival VS classical | Normal stroma: Hedgehog pathway inhibitor (+); Basal-like: oxaliplatine, 5-FU, BET inhibitor (+); Classical: docetaxel, SN-38 (−) | |
Pancreatic progenitor (PP), squamous, immunogenic and aberrantly differentiated endocrine exocrine (ADEX) | Squamous: pancreatic endodermal cell-fate determination genes, Hedgehog/Wnt pathway (−); TGF-β and Myc pathway (+); PP: developmental transcription factors (+), Notch pathway (+) ADEX: pancreatic developmental and differentiational genes (+), Notch pathway (+) | PP: good survival outcomes; Immunogenic and ADEX: intermediate survival outcomes; Squamous: worst survival outcomes | Squamous: oxaliplatine, 5-FU, BET inhibitor, GSK3β inhibitor (+); Squamous and PP subtypes: docetaxel (−); PP: SN-38 (−) | ||
Biederstädt et al. [80] | Squamous/basal- like | SUMO pathway and Myc (+) | Worse prognosis | SUMOylation inhibitor (+) | |
Mueller et al. [46] | Cluster 1, Cluster 2, Cluster 3, Cluster 4, Cluster 5 | Cluster 1: squamous differentiation; Cluster 2: epithelial differentiation; Cluster 3: embryonic development, EMT, MAPK pathway; Cluster 5: embryonic development | Â | Â | |
Pancreatic cancer | Puleo et al. [47] | Pure classical, immune classical, pure basal-like, stroma activated, desmoplastic | Stroma activated and pure basal-like: MET, Hedgehog pathway (+) | Pure classical and immune classical: good prognosis; Stroma activated and desmoplastic: poor prognosis; Pure basal-like: worst prognosis | Â |
Sivakumar et al. [48] | Notch, repressed Hedgehog/Wnt, cell cycle | Â | Notch: best prognosis; Repressed Hedgehog/Wnt: worst prognosis | Â | |
Seino et al. [49] | W+, W−, WRi | W+: exogenous Wnt (−), R-spondin (+); W−: exogenous Wnt (+), R-spondin (+); WRi: Wnt signaling (−) | W+: poor survival and metastatic progression |  | |
Gastric cancer | Lei et al. [53] | Proliferative, metabolic, mesenchymal | Proliferative: E2F, Myc, RAS (+); Mesenchymal: EMT, CSC pathway (+) | No significant differences among the 3 subtypes | Metabolic: 5-FU (+); Mesenchymal: PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitors (+) |
Cristescu et al. [54] | MSI, MSS/EMT, MSS/p53+ and MSS/p53− | MSS/EMT: EMT (+) | MSS/EMT: worst prognosis, recurrence, stage III/IV, earlier age; MSI: stage I/II, best prognosis |  | |
Cheul Oh et al. [55] | EP, MP | EP: Wnt (+), EMT (−); MP: EMT, IGF pathway, Hedgehog pathway (+) | EP: better survival; MP: poor survival | EP: adjuvant chemotherapy (+); MP: adjuvant chemotherapy (−), IGF1/IGF1R pathway inhibitor (+) | |
Cheong et al. [56] | Epithelial, immune, stem-like | Epithelial: CDX1 (+); Stem-like: SFRP4 (+) | Low-risk (immune-high), intermediate-risk (immune-low and stem-like-low), or high risk (immune-low and stem-like-high) | No-benefit (immune-high or immune-low and epithelial-low) or chemotherapy-benefit (immune-low and epithelial-high) | |
Oesophageal cancer | Walker et al. [57] | ESCC1, ESCC2, ESCC3 | ESCC1: SOX2, TP63 (+); ESCC2: ZNF750 and Notch1 mutation, CDK6 amplification (+), KDM6A and KDM2D (−), PIK3R1 and PTEN (−) ESCC3: mutations associated with RTK/RAS/PI3K pathway (+) |  |  |
Wang et al. [58] | Subtype I, Subtype II | Subtype II: epithelium development genes (+) | No significant differences between the 2 subtypes | Â | |
Jammula et al. [59] | Subtype 1, Subtype 2, Subtype 3, Subtype 4 | Subtype 1: DNA repair and cell cycle driver genes (+); Subtype 2: differentiational and developmental transcription factors (+); Subtype 4: high level of copy number alterations (+) | Â | Subtype 1: CDK4/6 inhibitors, docetaxel (+); Subtype 2: CDK4/6 inhibitors (+); Subtype 3: CDK4/6 inhibitors (+); Subtype 4: CDK4/6 inhibitors (+), CDK2 inhibitors (+); |