Table 4 Sensitivity analysis
No. | Study that leave | OR rate | CR rate | RR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Relative rate (95% CI) | I2 (%) | p-value | Relative rate (95% CI) | I2 (%) | p-value | Relative rate (95% CI) | I2 (%) | p-value | ||
A4 | Berentsen (2006) | 1.09 (1.00, 1.19) | 34.44 | 0.14 | 1.15 (0.98, 1.35) | 48.37 | 0.05 | Â | Â | Â |
A12 | Michel (2009) | 1.20 (1.02, 1.40) | 75.15 | 0.00 | 1.19 (0.99, 1.43) | 56.56 | 0.02 | 0.96 (0.55, 1.71) | 48.42 | 0.07 |
A18 | Birgens (2013) | 1.20 (1.03, 1.39) | 74.94 | 0.00 | 1.18 (0.99, 1.41) | 55.56 | 0.02 | Â | Â | Â |
A20 | Barcellini (2014) | 1.22 (1.02, 1.45) | 75.07 | 0.00 | 1.21 (0.98, 1.48) | 56.95 | 0.02 | 0.99 (0.54, 1.83) | 46.25 | 0.08 |
A21 | Roumier (2014) | 1.18 (1.01, 1.37) | 74.80 | 0.00 | 1.12 (0.95, 1.33) | 47.14 | 0.06 | 0.90 (0.47, 1.73) | 48.42 | 0.07 |
A23 | Fu (2016) | 1.22 (1.02, 1.46) | 75.17 | 0.00 | 1.16 (0.97, 1.40) | 56.23 | 0.02 | 0.88 (0.49, 1.56) | 46.94 | 0.08 |
A27 | Michel (2017) | 1.15 (1.00, 1.32) | 71.68 | 0.00 | 1.13 (0.96, 1.34) | 48.94 | 0.05 | 0.96 (0.56, 1.65) | 47.72 | 0.07 |
M7 | Froissart (2012) | 1.16 (0.99, 1.37) | 71.24 | 0.00 | 1.15 (0.93, 1.41) | 40.60 | 0.10 | 0.83 (0.49, 1.56) | 39.83 | 0.13 |
M9 | Hie (2014) | 1.19 (1.02, 1.38) | 75.20 | 0.00 | 1.18 (0.98, 1.44) | 57.31 | 0.02 | 1.09 (0.74, 1.60) | 0.00 | 0.47 |
M10 | Khandelwal (2014) | 1.23 (1.04, 1.46) | 70.04 | 0.00 | 1.24 (1.03, 1.49) | 25.52 | 0.22 | 0.83 (0.50, 1.35) | 32.18 | 0.18 |