Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of included studies

From: The relative efficacy of imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Study

Study characteristics

Assessment of study quality

Study design

Study duration (months)

Interventions

N

Median follow up (months)

Median dose

% lost to follow up

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

DASISION [13, 2931]

Multicentre, Randomised, Phase III

 

Dasatinib 100 mga

259

18.0

99 mg

15%

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Imatinib 400 mga

260

400 mg

19%

      

Baccarani et al. [32]

Prospective, randomised

12

Imatinib 400 mga

108

26

400 mg

 

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Imatinib 800 mga

108

26

720 mg

       

German CML Study IV [33, 34]

Randomised

36

Imatinib 800 ga

338

40

646 mg

 

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Imatinib 400 ga

326

40

400 mg

       

ENESTed [12, 3537]

Multicentre, Randomised, Phase III

60

Nilotinib 300 mgb

282

18

592 mg

16%

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Nilotinib 400 mgb

281

18

779 mg

18%

      

Imatinib 400 mga

283

18

400 mg

21%

      

S0325 Intergroup [38]

Open Label, Randomised, Phase II

12

Imatinib 400 mga

127

   

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Dasatinib 100 mga

126

         

ISTAHIT [39]

Multicentre, Randomised, Phase III

24

Imatinib 400 mga

114

12.75

400 mg

 

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Imatinib 800 mga

113

12.75

767 mg

       

Cortes et al. [40]

Multicentre, Randomised, Phase III

12

Imatinib 400 mga

157

17

 

0%

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Imatinib 400 mga

319

17

 

0.6%

      

SPIRIT [41]

Prospective, Randomised, Phase III

24

Imatinib 400 mga

159

47

400 mg

0%

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Imatinib 600 mga

160

47

590 mg

0%

      
  1. a) SID; b) BID; Q1) Was the method used to randomize patients described and adequate?; Q2) Was the method used for allocation concealment described and adequate?; Q3) Were the detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria described?; Q4) Was the method used to ensure treatment blinding described and adequate?; Q5) Were the patient baseline characteristics described? Q6) Were all analyses carried out using data from the Intention To Treat (ITT) patient group?