Open Access

Proteomic analysis of HEK293 cells expressing non small cell lung carcinoma associated epidermal growth factor receptor variants reveals induction of heat shock response

  • Arpana Kamath1,
  • Ann M Joseph1,
  • Kumud Gupta2,
  • Digamber Behera2,
  • Anand Jaiswal2,
  • Ravindra Dewan2 and
  • Maitreyi S Rajala1Email author
Experimental Hematology & Oncology20154:16

DOI: 10.1186/s40164-015-0010-5

Received: 29 May 2015

Accepted: 3 June 2015

Published: 12 June 2015

Abstract

In view of the fact that certain non small cell lung carcinoma associated epidermal growth factor receptor mutations keep the receptor constitutively active, the downstream effectors of altered activity of mutant receptors are largely unknown. By 2D gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF/MS analysis, we showed that increased activity of EGFR mutants, L858R, L861Q and A871G induce heat shock proteins such as Hsp70, Hsp60, Hsp90B1, Hsp5a, Hsp71 and few transcriptional factors. Of which, Hsp70 was observed to be regulated more selectively to L861Q mutant. Our results suggest the possible role of heat shock proteins in lung tumor progression considering EGFR mutations.

Keywords

EGFR NSCLC TKI Heat shock proteins Tumor progression Drug sensitivity

To the editor

Large number of studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFR) in non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients worldwide, most commonly in Asian countries including India in the last decade [1, 2]. In vitro studies have demonstrated the contribution of EGFR mutations to uncontrolled tumor proliferation and evasion of programmed cell death in various cancers [3, 4] including lung tumorigenesis in transgenic mice models [5]. It is known that a set of NSCLC associated EGFR mutations especially in tyrosine kinase (TK) domain have accounted for to have prognostic significance as they sensitize the receptor to TKI [6, 7]. Therefore, the question remains unanswered why NSCLC tumors with certain mutations respond to targeted drugs while others make the tumor resistant to the same drug [8]. This implies the complexity of drug sensitivity in patients harboring EGFR mutations and the complexity may be due to altered activity of mutant receptors affecting various downstream molecules for tumor survival which are largely unknown. Till date, detection of EGFR mutations remains an important prognostic test, as FDA approved drugs including the drugs which are currently under development for NSCLC treatment target EGFR. Unfortunately, in spite of considering mutations for treatment prediction, prognosis of advanced stage tumors remains poor. At this juncture, identification of downstream effectors of altered mutant receptor activity with prognostic importance is essential. Uncovering of such molecules may also allow us to understand the lung tumor progression and complexity of drug sensitivity driven by receptor variants.

We initiated our study by screening FFPE lung tumor tissues derived from NSCLC patients from north Indian population for EGFR mutations by RT-PCR followed by sequencing after obtaining ethical approval and informed consent from patients. Detailed methodology was given in Additional file 1. Receptor activity and drug sensitivity was determined by measuring phosphorylation on tyr1068 residue of each mutant generated by site directed mutagenesis. Two amino acid substitutions, L861Q (10.5 %) and A871G (2.1 %) in exon21 and K879R (24.2 %) in exon22 of TK domain were detected (Additional file 2). Former two demonstrated increased receptor activity (Additional file 3), and sensitivity to TKI, Gefitinib more selectively (Additional files 4 and 5). While the latter one was found to be indistinguishable from wild type receptor with respect to its activity and drug sensitivity.

Further, we investigated proteomic profile of HEK293 cells in response to altered activity of mutants L861Q, A871G and the most widely reported mutation, L858R by 2D GE followed by MALDI-TOF/Mass spectrometry analysis. Representative 2D gel with resolved protein spots of wild type EGFR expressing cells and different densities of analyzed spots of wild type vs. mutant receptors were shown in Additional files 6 and 7. Protein profile of cells expressing each mutant upon EGF stimulation was compared with protein profile of wild type receptor. Heat shock proteins such as Hsp70, Hsp71, Hsp90B1, Hsp60, and Hsp5a were identified to be differentially regulated largely in response to EGFR mutants (Table 1). Other effectors were FGG, IFIT2, cytoskeletal proteins and transcriptional factors such as HOXD11, HOX B4 (Additional file 8). Most of the proteins identified herein including IFIT2 and FGG were reported to be associated with various cancers with the potential to metastasize the tumor [9, 10]. Few of the identified proteins were validated at transcript level by quantitative real time PCR (Fig. 1a, b, Additional files 9 and 10). Up regulation of Hsp70 more selectively to L861Q mutant activity was consistent in our experiments. Reduction of its expression with Gefitinib treatment (Fig. 1c and d) suggests the possible role of this mutant in Hsp70 regulation. Published literature strongly argues that certain molecular chaperones, more importantly Hsp70 play a significant role in tumor survival [11]. Hsp70 expression was already reported in primary NSCLC tumors [12] and serum samples collected from NSCLC patients [13] as well. However, we demonstrated first time that heat shock proteins are the major downstream effectors of NSCLC associated EGFR variants. Supporting our data, some proteins detected in our study were recently reported to be differentially expressed in a proteomic study carried out on interstitial fluids collected from NSCLC patients [14]. Considering the importance of molecular chaperones in tumor survival and with their change of expression in response to altered EGFR activity, we hypothesize that they may also regulate progression of NSCLC tumors harboring EGFR mutations. So, the molecular mechanism involved in tumor progression, drug complexity and the prognostic implications of these heat shock proteins in NSCLC patient management are worth exploring.
Table 1

Differentially expressed proteins in cells expressing mutants vs. wild type EGFR identified by MALDI-TOF/MS analysis

Spot No.

Protein name

Acc. No

Mol. Wt

PI

Mascot Score

L858Rvs. WT

L861Q vs. WT

A871G vs. WT

6601

Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein

P11142

71082

5.37

24

1.8

1.2

1.13

7501

Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1

P08107

70294

5.48

147

1.7

2.1

0.93

3702

Endoplasmin (GRP94) HSP90B1

P14625

92696

4.76

88

0.02

0.28

0.02

5503

60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial

P10809

61187

5.7

75

1.4

1.2

1.03

4701

78 kDa GRP (HSP5A)

P11021

72402

5.07

158

1.1

1.31

0.34

7502

T-complex protein 1 subunit epsilon

P48643

60089

5.45

63

0.29

0.36

0.56

7403

Protein disulfide-isomerase

P30101

57146

5.98

84

0.73

0.96

0.63

4501

Tubulin alpha-1B chain

P68363

50804

4.94

128

0.58

0.69

0.33

3401

Tubulinbeta-2C chain

P68371

50255

4.79

239

0.63

1.2

0.72

4501

Vimentin

P08670

53676

5.06

24

0.58

0.69

0.33

6302

Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 18, 19

P05783

48029

5.34

319

0

1.5

0.86

7402

Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 8

P05787

53671

5.52

59

0.73

0.96

0.63

5203

Actin, cytoplasmic 2

P63261

42108

5.31

107

1.2

1.31

0.79

Fig. 1

Induction of heat shock response to EGFR mutants and regulation of Hsp70 by L861Q mutant. HEK293 stable cell lines expressing each mutant and wild type receptor were seeded in 35 mm dishes in duplicates. At 80-90 % confluency, cells were serum starved overnight followed by EGF stimulation at 10 ng/ml. At 10 min post stimulation, cells were harvested. Total protein from one set of plates and total RNA from duplicate set of plates were recovered. Equal amount of protein recovered from each receptor expressing cells was subjected to western blot analysis using anti phospho EGFR antibody specific to autophosphorylation site, tyr1068 residue. Blot was striped and re-probed with total EGFR antibody. RNA samples were reverse transcribed and subjected to quantitative real time PCR using gene specific primers. For Hsp70 expression studies, L861Q mutant expressing cells were cultured, serum starved followed by EGF stimulation. At every 5 min interval, total RNA and protein lysates recovered were subjected to quantitative real time PCR using Hsp70 primers and western blot analysis with anti Hsp70 antibody respectively. For inhibitory studies; cells were serum starved, treated with different concentrations of Gefitinib followed by EGF stimulation. Western blot analysis was done using anti Hsp70, anti phospho and total EGFR antibodies. a Phosphorylation status of three mutants vs. wild type receptor. b Folds difference of mutants vs. wild type receptor regulated gene transcripts of few heat shock proteins. c Hsp70 expression at transcript level measured at every 5 min following EGF stimulation in L861Q mutant vs. wild type receptor expressing cells d Hsp70 expression at protein level for 20 min, Hsp70 and phospho EGFR levels in cells treated with TKI, Gefitinib

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Indian Council of Medical Research (No. 5/13/94/2008- NCD III), New Delhi. India. We are grateful to Dr. Raju Rajala, OUHSC, USA for providing us with EGFR full length plasmid from which all receptor mutants were generated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University
(2)
National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases

References

  1. Bell DW, Brannigan BW, Matsuo K, Finkelstein DM, Sordella R, Settleman J, et al. Increased prevalence of EGFR –mutant in lung cancer in women and in East Asian populations: analysis of estrogen related polymorphism. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(13):4079–84.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mehta J. Molecular epidemiology of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancers in Indian population. Ind J Cancer. 2013;50(2):102–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Shin DY, Na II, Kim CH, Park S, Baek H, Yang SH. EGFR mutation and brain metastasis in pulmonary adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(2):195–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bos PD, Zhang XH, Nadal C, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature. 2009;459:1005–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pilot K, Zakowski MF, Fan PD, Sconfeld EA, Pao W, Varmus HE. Lung adenocarcinomas induced in mice by mutant EGF receptors founding human lung cancers respond to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor or to down-regulation of the receptors. Genes Dev. 2006;20(11):1496–510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordell R, Gurubhagavatulu S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small cell lung cancer to Gefitinib. New Eng J Med. 2004;350(21):2129–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response Gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004;304:1497–500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, Jänne PA, Kocher O, Meyerson M, et al. EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. New Engl J Med. 2005;352(8):786–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloomston M, Zhou JX, Rosemurgy AS, Frankel W, Muro-Cacho CA, Yeatman TJ. Fibrinogen gamma over expression in pancreatic cancer identified by large-scale proteomic analysis of serum samples. Cancer Res. 2006;66(5):2592–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lai KC, Liu CJ, Chang KW, Lee TC. Depleting IFIT2 mediates atypical PKC signaling to enhance the migration and metastatic activity of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2013;32(32):3686–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang HX, Liu YF, Yang SJ, Duan CG, Wang YX, Zhao J, et al. Expression of HSP70 Grp94 and IgG in human lung carcinoma. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008;24(5):447–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Małusecka E, Zborek A, Krzyzowska-Gruca S, Krawczyk Z. Expression of heat shock proteins HSP70 and HSP27 in primary non-small cell lung carcinomas.An immunohistochemical study. Anticancer Res. 2001;21(2A):1015–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zimmermann M, Nickl S, Lambers C, Hacker S, Mitterbauer A, Hoetzenecker K, et al. Discrimination of clinical stages in non-small cell lung cancer patients by serum HSP27 and HSP70: A multi-institutional case–control study. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1115–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li S, Wang R, Zhang M, Wang L, Cheng S. Proteomic analysis of non-small cell lung cancer tissue interstitial fluids. World J Surgical Oncol. 2013;11:173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kamath et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement